Literature DB >> 9727898

Biologic material in needles and cartridges after insulin injection with a pen in diabetic patients.

J P Le Floch1, C Herbreteau, F Lange, L Perlemuter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of non-inert material, including cells, in needles and cartridges after insulin injection with pen-like devices in diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 120 insulin-treated diabetic patients who used pen-like devices. The patients, 46 women and 74 men, were 20-77 years old; 60% had type 1 diabetes, and 38% were overweight. Duration of diabetes ranged from 1 month to 40 years, and insulin therapy ranged from 1 month to 30 years. Insulin injection was performed by a trained nurse, using the patient's usual pen and cartridge. A cytopathological examination was performed on the material obtained from the needle and found in the cartridge after centrifugation. All slides were read by a single investigator.
RESULTS: In 62% of the patients, non-inert material was found, including squamous (32%) and epithelial (58%) cells. Biologic material was found in 30% of the needles and 58% of the cartridges, and in both needle and cartridge in 25% of the population. Biologic material was found more frequently in patients who had a longer duration of diabetes, who were treated with insulin for a longer time, and who performed injection in the thighs or upper arms (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the presence of biologic material was associated with the duration of diabetes (R2 = 0.09; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that biologic material can be trapped in the delivery system, including the cartridge, after an insulin injection with a pen-like device. Our results emphasize the strict need for individual use of insulin delivery systems, including cartridges and nonrefillable pens, especially in clinics and hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9727898     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  6 in total

1.  Assisted monitoring of blood glucose: special safety needs for a new paradigm in testing glucose.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Joseph F Perz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Comparison of Inpatient Glycemic Control with Insulin Vials Versus Insulin Pens in General Medicine Patients.

Authors:  Juliann Horne; Rucha Bond; Preeyaporn Sarangarm
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-06

3.  "Wrong Patient" Insulin Pen Injections Alarmingly Frequent Even With Barcode Scanning.

Authors:  Matthew Grissinger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2017-09

4.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Injection site microflora in persons with diabetes: why needle reuse is not associated with increased infections?

Authors:  Sofia Wareham-Mathiassen; Lene Bay; Vera Pinto Glenting; Naireen Fatima; Henrik Bengtsson; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.428

6.  The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don't Know or Teach Can Make a Difference.

Authors:  Laurence J Hirsch; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2019-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.