PURPOSE: The role of genetic mechanisms and the influence of environmental events in human brain development have been difficult to evaluate. The purpose of this study was to compare the cerebral cortical morphology and midline structures of monozygotic twin pairs using MR imaging. METHODS: Six observers, blinded to twin pairings, evaluated the 3-D renderings of the cortical surface and midline structures from MR images of seven monozygotic twin pairs. A morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum and of the distance between the anterior and posterior commissures was also performed. RESULTS: Despite surprising anatomic differences, the brains of the twin pairs were similar enough to enable the observers to distinguish twin pairs from unrelated subjects. Five of six observers correctly identified the brains of all seven twin pairs; the remaining observer failed to make a correct match in only one of seven pairs. Three of six observers identified the midline sagittal images of the related twins in all seven pairs, and the other three identified the related midline sagittal images in five of seven pairs. The results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the observed differences in morphologic characteristics between twins necessarily reflect nongenetic influences, the cortical patterns and midline structures of monozygotic twins probably are genetically similar.
PURPOSE: The role of genetic mechanisms and the influence of environmental events in human brain development have been difficult to evaluate. The purpose of this study was to compare the cerebral cortical morphology and midline structures of monozygotic twin pairs using MR imaging. METHODS: Six observers, blinded to twin pairings, evaluated the 3-D renderings of the cortical surface and midline structures from MR images of seven monozygotic twin pairs. A morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum and of the distance between the anterior and posterior commissures was also performed. RESULTS: Despite surprising anatomic differences, the brains of the twin pairs were similar enough to enable the observers to distinguish twin pairs from unrelated subjects. Five of six observers correctly identified the brains of all seven twin pairs; the remaining observer failed to make a correct match in only one of seven pairs. Three of six observers identified the midline sagittal images of the related twins in all seven pairs, and the other three identified the related midline sagittal images in five of seven pairs. The results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the observed differences in morphologic characteristics between twins necessarily reflect nongenetic influences, the cortical patterns and midline structures of monozygotic twins probably are genetically similar.
Authors: Mark A Eckert; Christiana M Leonard; Elizabeth A Molloy; Jonathan Blumenthal; Alex Zijdenbos; Jay N Giedd Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Martin Styner; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Robert K McClure; Daniel R Weinberger; Douglas W Jones; Guido Gerig Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carrie E Bearden; Theo G M van Erp; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: J Eric Schmitt; Lisa T Eyler; Jay N Giedd; William S Kremen; Kenneth S Kendler; Michael C Neale Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.587