Literature DB >> 9726462

Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries.

H Isoda1, Y Takehara, S Isogai, H Takeda, M Kaneko, A Nozaki, Y Sun, T K Foo.   

Abstract

Our goal was to evaluate whether contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography using the MR Smartprep technique would enable us to obtain arterial-phase MR angiograms of the carotid and vertebral arteries. The study included 35 patients with suspected lesions of the neck in whom the MR Smartprep technique was used for MR angiography performed with a 1.5-T superconducting system. The tracker volume was placed primarily in the middle part of the right common carotid artery. The imaging volume was placed in a coronal direction to include the carotid and vertebral arteries from the aortic arch to the skull base. A centric phase-ordering scheme was used. Imaging times were 20 to 38 seconds for 14 patients and 11 to 16 seconds for 21 patients. By using a smaller tracker volume and an imaging time of less than 16 seconds, we were able to achieve a 100% successful triggering rate and to delineate selectively arterial-phase carotid and vertebral arteries with almost no venous contamination. Contract-enhanced 3-D MR angiography with the MR Smartprep technique was useful for showing arterial-phase carotid and vertebral arteries selectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9726462      PMCID: PMC8332233     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  6 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Val M Runge; John N Morelli; Kenneth D Williams; L Gill Naul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality.

Authors:  X Leclerc; L Nicol; J Y Gauvrit; V Le Thuc; D Leys; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ercument Unlu; Bilge Cakir; Burak Gocer; Nermin Tuncbilek; Murat Gedikoglu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms.

Authors:  H R Jäger; H Ellamushi; E A Moore; J P Grieve; N D Kitchen; W J Taylor
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.