Literature DB >> 9726396

Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.

C G Eden1, I R Mark, R R Gupta, J Eastman, N C Shrotri, R C Tiptaft.   

Abstract

Over a period of 57 months, 404 patients with distal ureteral calculi were treated by in situ SWL on a Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter and 163 by ureteroscopy (URS) and Swiss Lithoclast stone fragmentation. The case notes on these patients were reviewed for comparison of the initial stone number and individual length and for the calculation of the stone-free, treatment, retreatment, secondary procedure, and complication rates. Complete data were available on 447 patients. The median stone length was 7.0 (range 4-25) mm in the SWL group and 8.0 (range 5-13) mm in the URS group. The single-treatment stone-free rates for the SWL and URS groups were 74.8% and 89.7%, respectively, for single stones and 50.0% and 88.9%, respectively, for multiple (>1) stones. The mean treatment rates for the SWL and URS groups were 1.97 and 1.03, respectively, for single stones and 2.83 and 1.00, respectively, for multiple stones. The mean treatment rate for single stones subjected to SWL increased with increasing stone length (1.57 for stones <8 mm and 2.38 for stones >8 mm), whereas this was not the case for patients submitted to URS (1.20 and 1.27, respectively). The re-treatment rate for each group showed a reciprocal trend. Of the SWL group, 25.9% of the patients eventually required URS to render them stone-free. Nearly all (96%) of the patients undergoing SWL were treated as outpatients. The mean hospitalization in the URS group was 1.1 days. Three patients who underwent URS sustained a ureteral perforation, which was managed successfully by double-J stent insertion. The ideal primary treatment for small (<8 mm) distal ureteral calculi is in situ SWL, with URS plus Lithoclast fragmentation being reserved for failed SWL, single stones >8 mm in length, and multiple stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9726396     DOI: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo; Miguel Arrabal-Martin; Francisco Palao-Yago; Jose Luis Mijan-Ortiz; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-10-15

Review 2.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Selecting Treatment for Distal Ureteral Calculi: Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ojas D Shah; Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

4.  Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Honeck; A Häcker; P Alken; M S Michel; T Knoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-01-31

5.  Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?

Authors:  Lutfi Tunc; Bora Kupeli; Cagri Senocak; Turgut Alkibay; Sinan Sözen; Ustunol Karaoglan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Does stone dimension affect the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Ali Ihsan Taşci; Emin Ozbek; Bekir Aras; Levent Verim; Levent Gürkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mohamed Etafy; Gamal A M Morsi; Mansour S M Beshir; Sheri S Soliman; Hussein A Galal; Cervando Ortiz-Vanderdys
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-01-27

8.  Retrograde endoscopic lithotripsy using the innovative nanosecond electropulse method.

Authors:  Alexander Gudkov; Vacheslav Boshchenko; Alexander Petlin; Vladimir Afonin; Valery Diamant; Marat Lerner
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-17

Review 9.  An overview of treatment options for urinary stones.

Authors:  Hamid Shafi; Bobak Moazzami; Mohsen Pourghasem; Aliakbar Kasaeian
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2016

10.  Effect of ureteral calculus in outpatients receiving semirigid ureteroscope laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Chen-Pang Hou; Yu-Hsiang Lin; Horng-Heng Juang; Phei-Lang Chang; Chien-Lun Chen; Pei-Shan Yang; Chen-Che Lee; Ke-Hung Tsui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.