OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to assess the relative validity of a 170-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) adapted for use in the elderly. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The study was carried out in a sample of 80 men and women aged 55-75 y participating in a community based prospective cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The two-step dietary assessment comprised a simple self-administered questionnaire (20 min) followed by a structured interview with trained dietitians (20 min) based on the completed questionnaire. Multiple food records (FR) collected over a one year period served as reference method. 24 h urine urea was used as indirect marker for protein intake. RESULTS: Compared with FR, the SFFQ generally overestimated nutrient intake as reflected by difference in means and the ratio of SFFQ to FR. Energy adjustment reduced the observed overestimation. Pearson's correlation coefficients varied from close to 0.5 to about 0.9 for crude data, and after adjustment for age, sex, total energy intake, and for within-person variability in daily intake for 0.4-0.8. Cross-classification into quintiles resulted in correct classification into the same or adjacent quintile of 75.8% for crude and 76.8% for energy-adjusted data. Validation of protein intake estimated by SFFQ with protein excretion from 24h urine urea indicated overestimation of protein intake by SFFQ. Spearman correlation coefficient between protein intake estimated from urea excretion and SFFQ was 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation of a SFFQ for use in the elderly resulted in a valid and time-efficient dietary assessment instrument. Its ability to adequately rank study subjects according to their dietary intake support its application in epidemiological studies in the elderly.
OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to assess the relative validity of a 170-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) adapted for use in the elderly. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The study was carried out in a sample of 80 men and women aged 55-75 y participating in a community based prospective cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The two-step dietary assessment comprised a simple self-administered questionnaire (20 min) followed by a structured interview with trained dietitians (20 min) based on the completed questionnaire. Multiple food records (FR) collected over a one year period served as reference method. 24 h urine urea was used as indirect marker for protein intake. RESULTS: Compared with FR, the SFFQ generally overestimated nutrient intake as reflected by difference in means and the ratio of SFFQ to FR. Energy adjustment reduced the observed overestimation. Pearson's correlation coefficients varied from close to 0.5 to about 0.9 for crude data, and after adjustment for age, sex, total energy intake, and for within-person variability in daily intake for 0.4-0.8. Cross-classification into quintiles resulted in correct classification into the same or adjacent quintile of 75.8% for crude and 76.8% for energy-adjusted data. Validation of protein intake estimated by SFFQ with protein excretion from 24h urine urea indicated overestimation of protein intake by SFFQ. Spearman correlation coefficient between protein intake estimated from urea excretion and SFFQ was 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation of a SFFQ for use in the elderly resulted in a valid and time-efficient dietary assessment instrument. Its ability to adequately rank study subjects according to their dietary intake support its application in epidemiological studies in the elderly.
Authors: Stefan Walter; Johan Mackenbach; Zoltán Vokó; Stefan Lhachimi; M Arfan Ikram; André G Uitterlinden; Anne B Newman; Joanne M Murabito; Melissa E Garcia; Vilmundur Gudnason; Toshiko Tanaka; Gregory J Tranah; Henri Wallaschofski; Thomas Kocher; Lenore J Launer; Nora Franceschini; Maarten Schipper; Albert Hofman; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rachel S Newson; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Oscar H Franco; Bruno H C Stricker; Monique M B Breteler; Albert Hofman; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2010-06-01
Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: S E Power; I B Jeffery; R P Ross; C Stanton; P W O'Toole; E M O'Connor; G F Fitzgerald Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Annelies C Ham; Suzanne C van Dijk; Karin M A Swart; Anke W Enneman; Nikita L van der Zwaluw; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Natasja M van Schoor; M Carola Zillikens; Paul Lips; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Albert Hofman; Renger F Witkamp; André G Uitterlinden; Bruno H Stricker; Nathalie van der Velde Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kozeta Miliku; Janine F Felix; Trudy Voortman; Henning Tiemeier; Darryl W Eyles; Thomas H Burne; John J McGrath; Vincent W V Jaddoe Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Elizabeth E Devore; Francine Grodstein; Frank J A van Rooij; Albert Hofman; Meir J Stampfer; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-07
Authors: Elizabeth E Devore; Edith Feskens; M Arfan Ikram; Tom den Heijer; Meike Vernooij; Fedde van der Lijn; Albert Hofman; Wiro J Niessen; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Anneleen Kuijsten; Eric J G Sijbrands; Frank J A van Rooij; Johanna M Geleijnse; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Edith J M Feskens Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 19.112