A B Goldstein1. 1. Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current article offers a new conceptualization of factitious disorders based on cases reported in the literature. METHOD: The current analysis examines twenty-nine cases of factitious disorder patients over the course of ten years (1986-1996). Cases were found through PSYCHLIT and MEDLINE searches. Patient variables examined include: demographics, occupational status, marital status, childhood history, extent of medical history, the presence of a borderline personality disorder, and presence of a psychosocial stressor prior to the onset of the factitious disorder. RESULTS: An examination of the cases found demographic patterns of illness presentation consistent with previous reviews of the disorder. From the examination emerged two distinct types of factitious presentations-one acute, one chronic. A two-dimensional approach is introduced in an attempt to understand various disease presentations. Cases were classified based on proposed Current Life Stress and Chronic Life Pattern dimensions. These dimensions are measures of the extent to which the patient's factitious presentation is in response to an immediate psychosocial stressor, or an action consistent with a long-term maladaptive behavior pattern resulting from an underlying character pathology. Three patient groups were identified based on estimated patient levels of each dimension. The three groups are: Stress Response, Life Response, and Mixed Response. CONCLUSION: Recommendations are made to increase the role of physicians in the detection of factitious patients, as well as to move toward a more uniform reporting of cases of factitious disorders in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: The current article offers a new conceptualization of factitious disorders based on cases reported in the literature. METHOD: The current analysis examines twenty-nine cases of factitious disorderpatients over the course of ten years (1986-1996). Cases were found through PSYCHLIT and MEDLINE searches. Patient variables examined include: demographics, occupational status, marital status, childhood history, extent of medical history, the presence of a borderline personality disorder, and presence of a psychosocial stressor prior to the onset of the factitious disorder. RESULTS: An examination of the cases found demographic patterns of illness presentation consistent with previous reviews of the disorder. From the examination emerged two distinct types of factitious presentations-one acute, one chronic. A two-dimensional approach is introduced in an attempt to understand various disease presentations. Cases were classified based on proposed Current Life Stress and Chronic Life Pattern dimensions. These dimensions are measures of the extent to which the patient's factitious presentation is in response to an immediate psychosocial stressor, or an action consistent with a long-term maladaptive behavior pattern resulting from an underlying character pathology. Three patient groups were identified based on estimated patient levels of each dimension. The three groups are: Stress Response, Life Response, and Mixed Response. CONCLUSION: Recommendations are made to increase the role of physicians in the detection of factitious patients, as well as to move toward a more uniform reporting of cases of factitious disorders in the literature.