Literature DB >> 972298

Effects of electric-shock delivery on schedule-induced water intake: delay of shock, shock intensity, and body-weight loss.

N Hymowitz.   

Abstract

In each of four experiments, schedule-induced water intake in the rat was studied under fixed-time 40-sec food delivery. Experiments I and II studied the temporal relationship between response-independent electric-shock delivery and licking. Shock was delivered under a variable-time 60-sec schedule. A lick-dependent delay was imposed so that licking and shock delivery were systematically separated in time by a minimum of 1 to 15 sec. Over a wide range of shock intensities the data failed to reveal a consistent delay-of-shock effect. Similar shock intensities led to similar reduction of water intake at each delay of shock interval. Experiments III and IV studied the effects of body-weight loss on water intake during independent shock delivery. In Experiment III, shock was delivered under variable-time 60-sec with a minimum separation between shock and licking of 5 sec. In Experiment IV, shock was delivered under variable-time 180-sec. The minimum separation between shock and licking was 10 sec. In each study, the resistance of water intake to suppression by shock delivery increased as the degree of body-weight loss increased. Schedule-induced water intake was affected more by shock when the animal was maintained at 90% of free-feeding weight than at 70%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 972298      PMCID: PMC1333513          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT SHOCK.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  DELAYED PUNISHMENT OF A RUNWAY RESPONSE.

Authors:  A BARON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-08

3.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule.

Authors:  J L FALK
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some effects of punishment and intercurrent anxiety on a simple operant.

Authors:  H F HUNT; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1955-08

7.  Effects of response-dependent and independent electric shock on schedule-induced polydipsia.

Authors:  N Hymowitz; E X Freed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats.

Authors:  N W Bond; D E Blackman; P Scruton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior.

Authors:  J L Falk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1971-05

10.  Temporal relationship between response and punishment.

Authors:  D S Camp; G A Raymond; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-05
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Concurrent behavior: are the interpretations mutually exclusive?

Authors:  D O Lyon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

2.  Effects of signaled and unsignaled shock on schedule-controlled lever pressing and schedule-induced licking: Shock intensity and body weight.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Food-deprivation effects on punished schedule-induced drinking in rats.

Authors:  E Lamas; R Pellón
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.