Literature DB >> 9722549

Conformation of aspartate aminotransferase isozymes folding under different conditions probed by limited proteolysis.

J R Mattingly1, C Torella, A Iriarte, M Martinez-Carrion.   

Abstract

The partially homologous mitochondrial (mAAT) and cytosolic (cAAT) aspartate aminotransferase have nearly identical three-dimensional structures but differ in their folding rates in cell-free extracts and in their affinity for binding to molecular chaperones. In its native state, each isozyme is protease-resistant. Using limited proteolysis as an index of their conformational states, we have characterized these proteins (a) during the early stages of spontaneous refolding; (b) as species trapped in stable complexes with the chaperonin GroEL; or (c) as newly translated polypeptides in cell-free extracts. Treatment of the refolding proteins with trypsin generates reproducible patterns of large proteolytic fragments that are consistent with the formation of defined folding domains soon after initiating refolding. Binding to GroEL affords considerable protection to both isozymes against proteolysis. The tryptic fragments are similar in size for both isozymes, suggesting a common distribution of compact and flexible regions in their folding intermediates. cAAT synthesized in cell-free extracts becomes protease-resistant almost instantaneously, whereas trypsin digestion of the mAAT translation product produces a pattern of fragments qualitatively akin to that observed with the protein refolding in buffer. Analysis of the large tryptic peptides obtained with the GroEL-bound proteins reveals that the cleavage sites are located in analogous regions of the N-terminal portion of each isozyme. These results suggest that (a) binding to GroEL does not cause unfolding of AAT, at least to an extent detectable by proteolysis; (b) the compact folding domains identified in AAT bound to GroEL (or in mAAT fresh translation product) are already present at the early stages of refolding of the proteins in buffer alone; and (c) the two isozymes seem to bind in a similar fashion to GroEL, with the more compact C-terminal portion completely protected and the more flexible N-terminal first 100 residues still partially accessible to proteolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9722549     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  3 in total

1.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Electron paramagnetic resonance and fluorescence studies of the conformation of aspartate aminotransferase bound to GroEL.

Authors:  Alan Berezov; Megan J McNeill; Ana Iriarte; Marino Martinez-Carrion
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Molecular modeling and functional confirmation of a predicted fatty acid binding site of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase.

Authors:  Michael W Bradbury; Decherd Stump; Frank Guarnieri; Paul D Berk
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.