Literature DB >> 9721112

Changes in left ventricular structure and function in patients with white coat hypertension: cross sectional survey.

M W Muscholl1, H W Hense, U Bröckel, A Döring, G A Riegger, H Schunkert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relation between white coat hypertension and alterations of left ventricular structure and function.
DESIGN: Cross sectional survey.
SETTING: Augsburg, Germany.
SUBJECTS: 1677 subjects, aged 25 to 74 years, who participated in an echocardiographic substudy of the monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease Augsburg study during 1994-5. OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure measurements and M mode, two dimensional, and Doppler echocardiography. After at least 30 minutes' rest blood pressure was measured three times by a technician, and once by a physician after echocardiography. Subjects were classified as normotensive (technician <140/90 mm Hg, physician <160/95 mm Hg; n=849), white coat hypertensive (technician <140/90 mm Hg, physician >=160/95 mm Hg; n=160), mildly hypertensive (technician >=140/90 mm Hg, physician <160/95 mm Hg; n=129), and sustained hypertensive (taking antihypertensive drugs or blood pressure measured by a technician >=140/90 mm Hg, and physician >=160/95 mm Hg; n=538).
RESULTS: White coat hypertension was more common in men than women (10.9% versus 8.2% respectively) and positively related to age and body mass index. After adjustment for these variables, white coat hypertension was associated with an increase in left ventricular mass and an increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.2; P=0.009) compared with normotensive patients. The increase in left ventricular mass was secondary to significantly increased septal and posterior wall thicknesses whereas end diastolic diameters were similar in both groups with white coat hypertension or normotension. Additionally, the systolic white coat effect (difference between blood pressures recorded by a technician and physician) was associated with increased left ventricular mass and increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.05 each). Values for systolic left ventricular function (M mode fractional shortening) were above normal in subjects with white coat hypertension whereas diastolic filling and left atrial size were similar to those in normotension.
CONCLUSION: About 10% of the general population show exaggerated inotropic and blood pressure responses when mildly stressed. This is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9721112      PMCID: PMC28649          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7158.565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  28 in total

1.  Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method.

Authors:  R B Devereux; N Reichek
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D E Manyari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; K M Anderson; D D Savage; W B Kannel; J C Christiansen; W P Castelli
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse.

Authors:  G Mancia; G Parati; G Pomidossi; G Grassi; R Casadei; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  The cardiovascular risk factor profile in the study area Augsburg. Results from the first MONICA survey 1984/85.

Authors:  U Keil; J Stieber; A Döring; L Chambless; U Härtel; B Filipiak; H W Hense; M Tietze; J G Gostomzyk
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1988

6.  Relation of blood pressure and body build to left ventricular mass in normotensive and hypertensive employed adults.

Authors:  I W Hammond; R B Devereux; M H Alderman; J H Laragh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left atrial size in children.

Authors:  S Hiraishi; T G DiSessa; J M Jarmakani; T Nakanishi; J Isabel-Jones; W F Friedman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; D D Savage; R J Garrison; K M Anderson; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Physiological, psychological, and behavioral factors and white coat hypertension.

Authors:  W C Siegel; J A Blumenthal; G W Divine
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Left ventricular mass and geometry in patients with established hypertension and white coat hypertension.

Authors:  A Høegholm; K S Kristensen; L E Bang; J W Nielsen; W B Nielsen; N H Madsen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.689

View more
  11 in total

1.  Does "white coat hypertension" increase the risk for any adverse outcome from hypertension?

Authors:  J A Simon
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-01

2.  Survey of white coat hypertension. Definition differs from others.

Authors:  K Kario; T G Pickering
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

3.  White-coat and masked hypertension in children: association with target-organ damage.

Authors:  Stella Stabouli; Vasilios Kotsis; Savvas Toumanidis; Christos Papamichael; Andreas Constantopoulos; Nikos Zakopoulos
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Perioperative control of hypertension: when will it adversely affect perioperative outcome?

Authors:  John W Sear
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Paul Little; Jane Barnett; Lucy Barnsley; Jean Marjoram; Alex Fitzgerald-Barron; David Mant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-03

6.  How significant is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  Debbie L Cohen; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  The relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Hyung Tak Lee; Young-Hyo Lim; Bae Keun Kim; Kang Won Lee; Jae Ung Lee; Kyung Soo Kim; Soon Gil Kim; Jeong Hyun Kim; Heon Kil Lim; Jinho Shin; Yu-Mi Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 8.  Decoding white coat hypertension.

Authors:  Dennis A Bloomfield; Alex Park
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  Subclinical Organ Damage in White-Coat Hypertension: The Possible Role of Cystatin C.

Authors:  Emmanuel Androulakis; Nikolaos Papageorgiou; Eirini Lioudaki; Evaggelos Chatzistamatiou; Effimia Zacharia; Ioannis Kallikazaros; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Systemic hypertension and non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Satyajeet Misra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.