Literature DB >> 9721006

Effects of three tapering techniques on the performance, forces and psychometric measures of competitive swimmers.

S L Hooper1, L T Mackinnon, E M Ginn.   

Abstract

The 100-m and 400-m swim time, tethered swimming forces, mood states and self-ratings of well-being of 27 competitive swimmers were measured before and after 4 weeks of intense training and after 1 week and 2 weeks of tapering for major competition. The swimmers were divided into three groups. Each group completed one of three taper regimes similar to those currently performed by swimmers in preparation for competition: (a) reduced training frequency according to each athlete's daily ratings of well-being, (b) reduced training volume, and (c) reduced training volume and intensity. Significant improvements in the Profile of Mood States measures of tension, depression and anger (P < 0.05) were observed after 1 week of tapering, with significant improvements in total mood disturbance and fatigue (P < 0.05) and peak tethered swimming force (P < 0.01) after 2 weeks. Non-significant improvements in 100-m and 400-m swim time (P > 0.05) were observed and no significant differences were revealed among the three tapering techniques. These data highlighted the importance of providing sufficient recovery before competition, since 1 week of reduced training was not long enough to maximise the benefits of tapering. However, none of the three types of tapering currently used by competitive swimmers could be shown to be more beneficial than the others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9721006     DOI: 10.1007/s004210050417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  11 in total

1.  A reduction in training volume and intensity for 21 days does not impair performance in cyclists.

Authors:  G J Rietjens; H A Keizer; H Kuipers; W H Saris
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Training techniques to improve endurance exercise performances.

Authors:  Zuko N Kubukeli; Timothy D Noakes; Steven C Dennis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Systems modelling of the relationship between training and performance.

Authors:  Tim Taha; Scott G Thomas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Modeling the residual effects and threshold saturation of training: a case study of Olympic swimmers.

Authors:  Philippe Hellard; Marta Avalos; Gregoire Millet; Lucien Lacoste; Frederic Barale; Jean-Claude Chatard
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I: short term insufficient training stimulus.

Authors:  I Mujika; S Padilla
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Physiological changes associated with the pre-event taper in athletes.

Authors:  Iñigo Mujika; Sabino Padilla; David Pyne; Thierry Busso
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Muscle oxygenation trends after tapering in trained cyclists.

Authors:  J Patrick Neary; Donald C McKenzie; Yagesh N Bhambhani
Journal:  Dyn Med       Date:  2005-03-24

Review 8.  Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna E Saw; Luana C Main; Paul B Gastin
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Monitoring stress and recovery states: Structural and external stages of the short version of the RESTQ sport in elite swimmers before championships.

Authors:  Michel Nicolas; Philippe Vacher; Guillaume Martinent; Laurent Mourot
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.179

10.  Competitive performance, training load and physiological responses during tapering in young swimmers.

Authors:  Argyris G Toubekis; Evgenia Drosou; Vassilios Gourgoulis; Savvas Thomaidis; Helen Douda; Savvas P Tokmakidis
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.