PURPOSE: Obesity is a contributing factor to the development of stress urinary incontinence in women, in addition to surgical technical factors which may make some urologists reticent to offer operative therapy. We reviewed our series of morbidly obese women who underwent anti-incontinence surgery to determine if they were at higher risk for surgical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of our operative series of female stress urinary incontinence were reviewed and 16 women were considered morbidly obese. Transvaginal bladder neck suspension was performed in 4 women and sling procedures in 12, depending on preoperative urodynamic findings. RESULTS: Bladder neck suspension procedures failed in 2 cases, and no sling procedures failed. There was no recurrent or new pelvic floor deficit. The operations were somewhat more difficult to perform due to the body habitus of these patients but there were no intraoperative complications and only 1 minor wound infection postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese women with stress urinary incontinence can undergo operations for this disorder with a good chance of success. We recommend complete evaluation including urodynamics to ensure proper classification of stress incontinence. Sling operations may be the procedure of choice for stress incontinence in morbidly obese women.
PURPOSE: Obesity is a contributing factor to the development of stress urinary incontinence in women, in addition to surgical technical factors which may make some urologists reticent to offer operative therapy. We reviewed our series of morbidly obesewomen who underwent anti-incontinence surgery to determine if they were at higher risk for surgical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of our operative series of female stress urinary incontinence were reviewed and 16 women were considered morbidly obese. Transvaginal bladder neck suspension was performed in 4 women and sling procedures in 12, depending on preoperative urodynamic findings. RESULTS: Bladder neck suspension procedures failed in 2 cases, and no sling procedures failed. There was no recurrent or new pelvic floor deficit. The operations were somewhat more difficult to perform due to the body habitus of these patients but there were no intraoperative complications and only 1 minor wound infection postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obesewomen with stress urinary incontinence can undergo operations for this disorder with a good chance of success. We recommend complete evaluation including urodynamics to ensure proper classification of stress incontinence. Sling operations may be the procedure of choice for stress incontinence in morbidly obesewomen.
Authors: Tomasz Rechberger; Konrad Futyma; Katarzyna Jankiewicz; Aneta Adamiak; Michał Bogusiewicz; Paweł Skorupski Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 2.894