Literature DB >> 9719845

Pathogenicity and immunosuppressive properties of infectious bursal disease virus field isolates and commercial vaccines in India.

A Thangavelu1, G D Raj, S Elankumaran, B M Manohar, A Koteeswaran, A T Venugopalan.   

Abstract

The pathogenicity and immunosuppressive properties of two field isolates of infectious bursal disease. virus (IBDV) and five commercial IBDV live virus vaccines marketed in India were evaluated in this study. The pathogenicity of the wild type viruses and vaccines were based on mortality, the bursa:body weight ratio and microscopic lesions in the bursa in 3-week-old chicks that received these viruses. The immunosuppressive effects of these viruses were evaluated by measuring the antibody responses to sheep red blood cells, Brucella abortus plain antigen and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine in one-day-old chicks. One field isolate (N35/93) was found to be more pathogenic and immunosuppressive than the other (N45/92) while none of the commercial mild Lukert type vaccines were found to be pathogenic. One of the vaccine strains marked as Mild Lukert type was highly immunosuppressive; one was moderate and one could be classified as mild. Both the intermediate vaccines tested were highly immunosuppressive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9719845     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005059619825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  16 in total

1.  Standardization of the quantitative agar gel precipitin test for antibodies to infectious bursal disease.

Authors:  G W Wood; J C Muskett; C N Hebert; D H Thornton
Journal:  J Biol Stand       Date:  1979-04

2.  Comparison of two infectious bursal disease vaccine strains: efficacy and potential hazards in susceptible and maternally immune birds.

Authors:  J C Muskett; I G Hopkins; K R Edwards; D H Thornton
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1979-04-14       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Increased virulence of an infectious bursal disease live virus vaccine after passage in chicks.

Authors:  J C Muskett; N E Reed; D H Thornton
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Differentiation of infectious bursal disease viruses directly from infected tissues with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies: evidence of a major antigenic shift in recent field isolates.

Authors:  D B Snyder; D P Lana; P K Savage; F S Yancey; S A Mengel; W W Marquardt
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

5.  A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. (1). A comparison of macro and micro methods.

Authors:  W H Allan; R E Gough
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1974-08-10       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Investigations on live vaccines against infectious bursal disease of chicks.

Authors:  H Yadin; J Hoekstra; H L Oei; D J van Roozelaar
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  Studies on a vaccine against infections bursal disease.

Authors:  R L Reece; J A Gould; M Hindmarsh
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.281

8.  Characterisation of Newcastle disease viruses isolated in India.

Authors:  K Kumanan; S Elankumaran; K Vijayarani; K S Palaniswami; V D Padmanaban; R J Manvell; D J Alexander
Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed B       Date:  1992-07

9.  Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: Isolation and characterisation of a highly virulent strain.

Authors:  T P Berg; M Gonze; G Meulemans
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.378

10.  The pathogenesis of infectious bursal disease: serologic, histopathologic, and clinical chemical observations.

Authors:  D H Ley; R Yamamoto; A A Bickford
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1983 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in the Cytokine and Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression Following Infection of Indigenous and Commercial Chickens With Infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  G Dhinakar Raj; T M Chozhavel Rajanathan; K Kumanan; S Elankumaran
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2011-09-06

2.  Immunopathological comparison of in ovo and post-hatch vaccination techniques for infectious bursal disease vaccine in layer chicks.

Authors:  Iqra Zaheer; Wei Chen; Ahrar Khan; Abdelmotaleb Elokil; Muhammad Kashif Saleemi; Tean Zaheer; Muhammad Zargham Khan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Alteration of immunological parameters in infectious bronchitis vaccinated-specific pathogen-free broilers after the use of different infectious bursal disease vaccines.

Authors:  Caterina Lupini; Giulia Quaglia; Giulia Mescolini; Elisa Russo; Roberta Salaroli; Monica Forni; Sara Boldini; Elena Catelli
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Development of a Novel Assay Based on Plant-Produced Infectious Bursal Disease Virus VP3 for the Differentiation of Infected From Vaccinated Animals.

Authors:  Alessio Bortolami; Marcello Donini; Carla Marusic; Chiara Lico; Charifa Drissi Touzani; Federica Gobbo; Elisa Mazzacan; Andrea Fortin; Valentina Maria Panzarin; Francesco Bonfante; Selene Baschieri; Calogero Terregino
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.