Literature DB >> 9719469

Impact of dioxin-type induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes on the metabolism of endo- and xenobiotics.

D Schrenk1.   

Abstract

The induction of a number of drug-metabolizing enzymes is among the best-understood biochemical effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Among the cytochrome P450s (CYPs), the genes encoding CYP1A1, 1A2, and 1B1 are responsive to AhR agonists, i.e. their expression is inducible in various mammalian tissues and organs as well as in many types of cell lines and primary cells in culture. In addition, an aldehyde dehydrogenase, an NADPH-quinone-oxidoreductase, and the phase II conjugating enzymes glutathione-S-transferase (GST) Ya and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 have been identified as responsive to AhR agonists. Induced expression of these members of the AhR gene battery is thought to be aimed at an improved elimination of the inducing agent and its metabolites. However, the identity of the physiological ligand(s) of the AhR is still obscure. The consequences of induced expression of AhR-regulated genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes have been investigated in human populations, e.g. in smokers, and in various experimental models. A prominent example of increased adverse effects due to the induction of CYP1A isozymes is the metabolic activation of carcinogenic aromatic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. An increasing amount of data is also available on the impact of dioxin-type induction on the metabolism of drugs, food constituents, and endogenous substrates. For example, the hepatic clearance of the drug theophylline, which is widely used in asthma therapy, is enhanced significantly in smokers. Increased glucuronidation of thyroxine in rats treated with TCDD or other potent AhR agonists is thought to result in hypothyroxinemia and its biological consequences, such as sustained hyperplasia of the thyroid, bearing a higher risk of thyroid cancer. The relevance of these observations for humans exposed to dioxin-type inducers is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9719469     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00591-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  30 in total

1.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) alters early embryonic development in a rat IVF exposure model.

Authors:  Brian K Petroff; Kelli E Valdez; Sara B Brown; Joanna Piasecka; David F Albertini
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is activated by modified low-density lipoprotein.

Authors:  Brian J McMillan; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Leflunomide induces NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 enzyme via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in neonatal mice.

Authors:  Amrit Kumar Shrestha; Ananddeep Patel; Renuka T Menon; Weiwu Jiang; Lihua Wang; Bhagavatula Moorthy; Binoy Shivanna
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor negatively regulates dendritic cell immunogenicity via a kynurenine-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Nam Trung Nguyen; Akihiro Kimura; Taisuke Nakahama; Ichino Chinen; Kazuya Masuda; Keiko Nohara; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Tadamitsu Kishimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hypoxia and Mucosal Inflammation.

Authors:  Sean P Colgan; Eric L Campbell; Douglas J Kominsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 23.472

6.  Atranorin and lecanoric acid antagonize TCDD-induced xenobiotic response element-driven activity, but not xenobiotic response element-independent activity.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Nakashima; Hiroki Tanabe; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Makoto Inoue
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.343

7.  Differential consequences of two distinct AhR ligands on innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jennifer L H Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; Emily Resseguie; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  The search for endogenous activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Linh P Nguyen; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Can persistent organic pollutants explain the association between serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  D-H Lee; M W Steffes; D R Jacobs
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Thyroid-disrupting chemicals: interpreting upstream biomarkers of adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Mark D Miller; Kevin M Crofton; Deborah C Rice; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.