Literature DB >> 9719217

Rationale for early incremental dialysis with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

K D Nolph1.   

Abstract

There are good reasons to suspect that if a weekly Kt/V urea of <2.0 is inadequate for CAPD then it is also inadequate for CRF without dialysis. Spontaneous protein intakes tend to fall below 0.7-0.8 g/kg at these levels in both CAPD and CRF. Low protein intakes can be associated with deterioration in nutritional status and a falling serum albumin. Low serum albumin concentrations at the start of dialysis are associated with increased risk of death during dialysis. Some nutritional problems which develop during conservative management prior to dialysis initiation may not be completely reversible. Since both renal function and CAPD offer nearly continuous urea clearances, it makes sense that targets for adequacy in CAPD should also be targets for initiation of chronic dialysis. At this time, it seems that a weekly Kt/V urea of 2.0 is a reasonable value. There may be reasons why chronic peritoneal dialysis is more suitable than intermittent HD for the initiation of early incremental dialysis. These advantages have to do with the ease of providing small incremental dialysis doses as needed to maintain the Kt/V urea at a level of 2.0 for the kidney and dialysis combined. Early CAPD may be less threatening to residual renal function than HD. Daily CAPD allows early control of sodium and water balance. It also delays the use of blood access sites until larger dialysis doses achieved with HD are absolutely necessary. There may be cost advantages as well. We should abandon the philosophy of initiating dialysis after patients have already suffered the ravages of uraemia and related malnutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9719217     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/13.suppl_6.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  4 in total

1.  Incremental peritoneal dialysis allows to reduce the time spent for dialysis, glucose exposure, economic cost, plastic waste and water consumption.

Authors:  Luca Nardelli; Antonio Scalamogna; Elisa Cicero; Giuseppe Castellano
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.393

2.  Incremental peritoneal dialysis favourably compares with hemodialysis as a bridge to renal transplantation.

Authors:  Alessandro Domenici; Maria Cristina Comunian; Loredana Fazzari; Francesca Sivo; Angela Dinnella; Barbara Della Grotta; Giorgio Punzo; Paolo Menè
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-15

3.  Incremental peritoneal dialysis: a 10 year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Massimo Sandrini; Valerio Vizzardi; Francesca Valerio; Sara Ravera; Luigi Manili; Roberto Zubani; Bernardo J A Lucca; Giovanni Cancarini
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  The Use of Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Contemporary Peritoneal Dialysis Program.

Authors:  Ghada A Ankawi; Nancy I Woodcock; Arsh K Jain; Amit X Garg; Peter G Blake
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-12-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.