Comparison of the bone robusticity index and bone weight/bone length index with the results of bone densitometry and bone histomorphometry in experimental studies.

In experimental studies of bone in rats, two morphometric indices reflecting bone density have been proposed, the bone robusticity index and bone weight/bone length index. In rats, the bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of a selected bone can be determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); bone volume can be measured by histomorphometry and other techniques. This study was undertaken to compare two morphometric indices (bone robusticity and bone weight/bone length) with the results of DXA and histomorphometry. Forty female Wistar rats (100 days old, mean weight 239+/-12 g) were studied: 20 controls and 20 ovariectomized rats (OVX). The morphometric indices and BMD differed significantly (Friedman test) in the overall group of rats; no differences were observed in the control group, but significant differences were apparent in the OVX group (p<0.0001). The morphometric indices correlated more closely with BMC than with BMD; the femur length/ femur weight index had closer correlations than the robusticity index. Nonetheless, both morphometric indices differed significantly from BMD determined by DXA under abnormal conditions, which makes them unreliable for use in these circumstances.