Literature DB >> 9718376

Subcutaneous compared with intravenous epoetin in patients receiving hemodialysis. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Erythropoietin in Hemodialysis Patients.

J S Kaufman1, D J Reda, C L Fye, D S Goldfarb, W G Henderson, J G Kleinman, C A Vaamonde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that if recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously, a lower dose may be sufficient to maintain the hematocrit at a given level.
METHODS: In a randomized, unblinded trial conducted at 24 hemodialysis units at Veterans Affairs medical centers, we assigned 208 patients who were receiving long-term hemodialysis and epoetin therapy to treatment with either subcutaneous or intravenous epoetin. The dose was initially reduced until the hematocrit was below 30 percent and then was gradually increased to a level that would maintain the hematocrit in the range of 30 to 33 percent for 26 weeks. We compared the average doses in the 26-week maintenance phase and the discomfort associated with the two routes of administration.
RESULTS: For the 107 patients treated by the subcutaneous route, the average weekly dose of epoetin during the maintenance phase was 32 percent less than that for the 101 patients treated by the intravenous route (mean [+/-SD], 95.1+/-75.0 vs. 140.3+/-88.5 U per kilogram of body weight per week; P<0.001). Only one patient in the subcutaneous-therapy group withdrew from the study because of pain at the injection site, and 86 percent rated the pain associated with subcutaneous administration as ranging from absent to mild.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving hemodialysis, subcutaneous administration of epoetin can maintain the hematocrit in a desired target range, with an average weekly dose of epoetin that is lower than with intravenous administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718376     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199808273390902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  28 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Authors:  Sameer Doshi; Wojciech Krzyzanski; Susan Yue; Steven Elliott; Andrew Chow; Juan José Pérez-Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Between subjects variability in haemoglobin and dose are not associated with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent used to treat anaemia in dialysis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan José Pérez-Ruixo; Mercedes Cucala-Ramos; Ester García-Gonzalo; Beatriz Del Val Romero; Neus Valveny
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Long-term outcome of individuals with pure red cell aplasia and antierythropoietin antibodies in patients treated with recombinant epoetin: a follow-up report from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Denis Cournoyer; Kenneth R Carson; Jerome Rossert; Stefano Luminari; Andrew M Evens; Francesco Locatelli; Steven M Belknap; June M McKoy; E Alison Lyons; Benjamin Kim; Rishi Sharma; Stacey Costello; Edwin B Toffelmire; George A Wells; Hans A Messner; Paul R Yarnold; Steven M Trifilio; Dennis W Raisch; Timothy M Kuzel; Allen Nissenson; Lay-Cheng Lim; Martin S Tallman; Nicole Casadevall
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Association of Erythropoietin Dose and Route of Administration with Clinical Outcomes for Patients on Hemodialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel G Wright; Elizabeth C Wright; Andrew S Narva; Constance T Noguchi; Paul W Eggers
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Two different dosing regimens of human recombinant erythropoietin beta during preoperative autologous blood donation in patients having hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Melita Buljan; Damir Nemet; Branka Golubic-Cepulic; Goran Bicanic; Branko Tripkovic; Domagoj Delimar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of stress erythropoiesis: change in erythropoietin receptor pool size following double phlebotomies in sheep.

Authors:  Mohammad I Saleh; John A Widness; Peter Veng-Pedersen
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 7.  Use of agents stimulating erythropoiesis in digestive diseases.

Authors:  Rosario Moreno López; Beatriz Sicilia Aladrén; Fernando Gomollón García
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Differentiating factors between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a guide to selection for anaemia of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Robert Deicher; Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Route of epoetin administration influences hemoglobin variability in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Tejas Patel; Angie Hirter; James Kaufman; Sai Ram Keithi-Reddy; Domenic Reda; Ajay Singh
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 10.  Past, present and future of erythropoietin use in the elderly.

Authors:  Angel L M de Francisco; Gema Fernandez Fresnedo; Emilio Rodrigo; Celestino Piñera; Milagros Heras; Rosa Palomar; Juan C Ruiz; Manuel Arias
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.