Literature DB >> 9718299

Dual recognition and the role of specificity-determining residues in colicin E9 DNase-immunity protein interactions.

W Li1, S J Hamill, A M Hemmings, G R Moore, R James, C Kleanthous.   

Abstract

The immunity protein Im2 can bind and inhibit the noncognate endonuclease domain of the bacterial toxin colicin E9 with a Kd of 19 nM, 6 orders of magnitude weaker than that of the cognate immunity protein Im9 with which it shares 68% sequence identity. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that the specificity differences of these four-helix immunity proteins is due almost entirely to helix II which is largely variable in sequence in the immunity protein family. From alanine scanning mutagenesis of Im9 in conjunction with high-field NMR data, a dual recognition model for colicin-immunity protein specificity has been proposed whereby the conserved residues of helix III of the immunity protein act as the anchor of the endonuclease binding site while the variable residues of helix II control the specificity of the protein-protein interaction. In this work, we identify three residues (at positions 33, 34, and 38) in helix II which define the specificity differences of Im2 and Im9 for colicin E9 and, using alanine mutagenesis of the putative endonuclease binding surface of Im2, compare the distribution of binding energies for conserved and nonconserved sites in both immunity proteins. This comparison highlights the conserved residues of both Im2 and Im9 as the major determinants of E9 DNase binding energy. Conversely, the nonconserved, specificity-determining residues only contribute to the E9 DNase binding energy in the cognate Im9 protein, while in the noncognate immunity protein Im2, they either destabilize the complex or do not contribute to the binding energy. This comparative alanine scan of two immunity proteins therefore supports the dual recognition mechanism of selectivity in colicin-immunity protein interactions and provides a basis for understanding specificity in other protein-protein interaction systems involving structurally conserved protein families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718299     DOI: 10.1021/bi9808621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  21 in total

1.  Translocation of a functional protein by a voltage-dependent ion channel.

Authors:  Stephen L Slatin; Angèle Nardi; Karen S Jakes; Daniel Baty; Denis Duché
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Tal Elkayam; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Nicola A G Meenan; Amit Sharma; Sarel J Fleishman; Colin J Macdonald; Bertrand Morel; Ruth Boetzel; Geoffrey R Moore; David Baker; Colin Kleanthous
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; Iain H Moal; Howook Hwang; Zhiping Weng; Paul A Bates; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Crucial roles of single residues in binding affinity, specificity, and promiscuity in the cellulosomal cohesin-dockerin interface.

Authors:  Michal Slutzki; Dan Reshef; Yoav Barak; Rachel Haimovitz; Shahar Rotem-Bamberger; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Interactions of TolB with the translocation domain of colicin E9 require an extended TolB box.

Authors:  Sarah L Hands; Lisa E Holland; Mireille Vankemmelbeke; Lauren Fraser; Colin J Macdonald; Geoffrey R Moore; Richard James; Christopher N Penfold
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Designer protein assemblies with tunable phase diagrams in living cells.

Authors:  Meta Heidenreich; Joseph M Georgeson; Emanuele Locatelli; Lorenzo Rovigatti; Saroj Kumar Nandi; Avital Steinberg; Yotam Nadav; Eyal Shimoni; Samuel A Safran; Jonathan P K Doye; Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  Selection of near-native poses in CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Authors:  Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

9.  Performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Brian G Pierce; Jui-Hung Hung; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

10.  Energy-dependent immunity protein release during tol-dependent nuclease colicin translocation.

Authors:  Mireille Vankemmelbeke; Ying Zhang; Geoffrey R Moore; Colin Kleanthous; Christopher N Penfold; Richard James
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.