Literature DB >> 9717172

Characterization and analysis of Chinese hamster ovary cell ERCC1 mutant alleles.

R L Rolig1, M P Lowery, G M Adair, R S Nairn.   

Abstract

We isolated and characterized the ERCC1 coding sequence from three Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) parental (CHO-AA8, CHO-AT3-2 and CHO-9) and 10 ERCC1 mutant cell lines. Two general classes of mutations were observed: two mutant cell lines exhibited nucleotide additions or deletions to produce frameshift mutations and seven mutant cell lines exhibited point mutations that resulted in transitions or transversions, including nonsense mutations and mutations that generated intron/exon splicing errors. One mutant (UV201) which had been provisionally assigned to ERCC1 complementation group 1 (CG1) had no detectable mutation in its coding sequence. Of the nine ERCC1 mutant alleles characterized two mutations were identified in the XpA binding region of the Ercc1 protein; no mutations were found in the N-terminal portion of the Ercc1 protein. Results of Northern hybridization analysis showed that the relative levels of ERCC1 mRNA differed significantly both among the parental cell lines and among the mutant cell lines derived from each parental cell line. Western analysis with a CHO Ercc1-specific antibody detected Ercc1 protein in each of the parental cell lines and also in UV201. The marked reduction in Ercc1 protein levels observed in all the other mutants examined supports the hypothesis that ERCC1 mutations may destabilize this polypeptide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717172     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/13.4.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

1.  Activity of individual ERCC1 and XPF subunits in DNA nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri L Gaillard; R D Wood
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The XPA-binding domain of ERCC1 is required for nucleotide excision repair but not other DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Barbara Orelli; T Brooke McClendon; Oleg V Tsodikov; Tom Ellenberger; Laura J Niedernhofer; Orlando D Schärer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Distinct cellular phenotype linked to defective DNA interstrand crosslink repair and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Gorniewska; Katarzyna Kluzek; Lidia Gackowska; Izabela Kubiszewska; Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Aneta Bialkowska
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  Effects of varying gene targeting parameters on processing of recombination intermediates by ERCC1-XPF.

Authors:  Jennifer J Rahn; Brian Rowley; Megan P Lowery; Luis Della Coletta; Tiffany Limanni; Rodney S Nairn; Gerald M Adair
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-11-30

5.  Role of ERCC1 in removal of long non-homologous tails during targeted homologous recombination.

Authors:  G M Adair; R L Rolig; D Moore-Faver; M Zabelshansky; J H Wilson; R S Nairn
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Characterization of CHO XPF mutant UV41: influence of XPF heterozygosity on double-strand break-induced intrachromosomal recombination.

Authors:  Leisa L Talbert; Luis Della Coletta; Megan G Lowery; Angela Bolt; David Trono; Gerald M Adair; Rodney S Nairn
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-10

7.  ERCC1/XPF limits L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Stephen L Gasior; Astrid M Roy-Engel; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-04-18

8.  The ERCC1/XPF endonuclease is required for efficient single-strand annealing and gene conversion in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Ali Z Al-Minawi; Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Cellular levels and molecular dynamics simulations of estragole DNA adducts point at inefficient repair resulting from limited distortion of the double-stranded DNA helix.

Authors:  Shuo Yang; Matthias Diem; Jakob D H Liu; Sebastiaan Wesseling; Jacques Vervoort; Chris Oostenbrink; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.