Literature DB >> 9716766

Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections. A prospective randomized trial.

W Schwenk1, B Böhm, J M Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional colorectal resections are associated with severe postoperative pain and prolonged fatigue. The laparoscopic approach to colorectal tumors may result in less pain as well as less fatigue, and may improve postoperative recovery after colorectal resections.
METHODS: Sixty patients were included into a prospective randomized trial to determine the influence of laparoscopic (n = 30) or conventional (n = 30) resection of colorectal tumors on postoperative pain and fatigue. Major endpoints of the study were dose of morphine sulfate during patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), visual analog scale for pain while coughing (VASC), and visual analogue scale for fatigue (VASF). Efficacy of pain medication was assessed by visual analogue score at rest (VASR).
RESULTS: Preoperative age, sex, stage, and localization of tumors were comparable in both groups. The PCA dose of morphine given immediately after surgery until postoperative day 4 was higher in the conventional group (median, 1.37 mg/kg; 5-95 percentile 0.71-2. 46 mg/kg) than the laparoscopic group (0.78 mg/kg; 0.24-2.38 mg/kg, p < 0.01). Postoperative VASR was comparable between both groups, but VASC was higher from the first to the seventh postoperative day (p < 0.01). Postoperative fatigue was higher after conventional than after laparoscopic surgery from the second to the seventh day (p < 0. 05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that analgetic requirements are lower and pain is less intense after laparoscopic than after conventional colorectal resection. Patients also experience less fatigue after minimal invasive surgery. Because of these differences, the duration of recovery is shortened, and the postoperative quality of life is improved after laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9716766     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  57 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic colon surgery. Indications and technique].

Authors:  C-T Germer; J-P Ritz; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

Review 3.  Quality of life after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanne A L Bartels; Malaika S Vlug; Dirk T Ubbink; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic resection for colon cancer.

Authors:  Dara O Kavanagh; David Gibson; Diarmaid C Moran; Myles Smith; Kate O Donnell; Emmanuel Eguare; Frank B V Keane; Diarmaid S O Riordain; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Five-year long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Long Bai; Bin Chen; Yong Zhou; Xiao-Ting Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Fellowship training may be an advantage.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; R Grégoire; S E Burpee; K T Pace; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.