Literature DB >> 9716041

Effect of radiotherapy on the interpretation of routine follow-up mammography after conservative breast surgery: a randomized study.

K Holli1, R Saaristo, J Isola, M Hyöty, M Hakama.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy after conservative surgery causes fat necrosis, fibrosis, skin thickening and other parenchymal distortion of the breast. The interpretation of a mammogram of the irradiated breast may therefore be difficult. We studied the effect of radiotherapy on the interpretation of the routine mammography used in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. A total of 144 low-risk breast cancer patients were randomized to radiotherapy or to no further treatment after conservative surgery. The first routine follow-up mammography was performed 18 months after surgery and every 18 months after that. The number of mammography examinations was estimated per patient and per follow-up year. The number of extra diagnostic tests and the occurrence of positive findings were assessed per mammography session and per follow-up year. Further diagnostic tests prompted by difficulties in interpreting the mammogram were performed to an extent of 0.19 per mammography examination in the radiotherapy group and of 0.15 in the non-radiotherapy group, i.e. 1.3 times more often. Findings that turned out to be negative at confirmation were 2.0 times (P< 0.05) more common in the radiotherapy group. These false-positive findings were more common in the radiotherapy group than in the surgery group and only shortly after treatment. Mammography is more difficult to interpret after radiotherapy than after conservative surgery alone, especially shortly after treatment, and more often involves extra diagnostic tests and findings that will be negative at confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9716041      PMCID: PMC2063090          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  12 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: the current position.

Authors:  N Wald; C Frost; H Cuckle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

2.  Screening in practice: Reducing the psychological costs.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

Review 3.  Breast imaging. A critical aspect of breast conserving treatment.

Authors:  N L Sadowsky; A Semine; J R Harris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognosis following local or regional recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A Recht; S J Schnitt; J L Connolly; M A Rose; B Silver; S Come; I C Henderson; S Slavin; J R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Psychological costs of screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

6.  The postirradiated breast.

Authors:  J S Welch
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Anderson; C K Redmond; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; W M Cronin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clinical epidemiology of bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  H Brenner; B Engelsmann; C Stegmaier; H Ziegler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up.

Authors:  M Rosselli Del Turco; D Palli; A Cariddi; S Ciatto; P Pacini; V Distante
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Advanced breast cancer and its prevention by screening.

Authors:  H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; J C de Haes; G J van Oortmarssen; J G Klijn; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ivan Moschetti; Michela Cinquini; Matteo Lambertini; Alessia Levaggi; Alessandro Liberati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 2.  Breast cancer follow-up in the adjuvant setting.

Authors:  James Khatcheressian; Craig Swainey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  How do I follow patients with early breast cancer after completing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer M Matro; Lori J Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

4.  Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.

Authors:  Sisse Helle Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Mette Bach Larsen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Gustavo A Viani; Eduardo J Stefano; Sérgio L Afonso; Lígia I De Fendi; Francisco V Soares; Paola G Leon; Flavio S Guimarães
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.