Literature DB >> 9714576

Changes in cochlear mechanics during vocalization: evidence for a phasic medial efferent effect.

R L Goldberg1, O W Henson.   

Abstract

The mustached bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii, has a finely tuned cochlea that rings at its resonant frequency in response to an acoustic tone pip. The decay time (DT) and frequency of these damped oscillations can be measured from the cochlear microphonic potential (CM) to study changes in cochlear mechanics. In this report, we describe phasic changes that occur in synchrony with communication sound vocalizations of the bat. Three animals with chronically implanted electrodes were studied. During the experiments, 1-2 ms tone pips were emitted from a speaker every 200 ms. This triggered a computer analysis of the resulting CM to determine the DT and cochlear resonance frequency (CRF) of the ringing. The time relative to vocalizations was determined by monitoring the output of a microphone placed near a bat's mouth. Similar results were obtained from all three bats tested. In a representative case, the average DT was 2.33 +/- 0.25 ms while the bat was quiet, but it decreased by 46% to 1.26 +/- 0.75 during vocalizations, which indicates a greater damping of the cochlear partition. Sometimes, DT started decreasing immediately before the bat vocalized. After the end of a vocalization, the return to baseline values varied from rapid (milliseconds) to gradual (1-2 seconds). The CRF also changed from baseline values during vocalization, although the amount and direction of change were not predictable. When gentamicin was administered to block the action of medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents, DT reduction was still evident during vocalization but less pronounced. We conclude that phasic changes in damping occur in synchrony with vocalization, and that the MOC system plays a role in causing suppression. Since suppression can begin prior to vocalization, this may be a synkinetic effect, mediated by neural outflow to the ear in synchrony with neural outflow to the middle ear muscles and the muscles used for vocalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9714576     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00078-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  Vocal pathways modulate efferent neurons to the inner ear and lateral line.

Authors:  Matthew S Weeg; Bruce R Land; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Role of corticofugal feedback in hearing.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Vocal corollary discharge communicates call duration to vertebrate auditory system.

Authors:  Boris P Chagnaud; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Vocalization frequency and duration are coded in separate hindbrain nuclei.

Authors:  Boris P Chagnaud; Robert Baker; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Tuning shifts of the auditory system by corticocortical and corticofugal projections and conditioning.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.