Literature DB >> 9714375

Refractory properties of auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of human cochlear nucleus: evidence of neural generators.

M D Waring1.   

Abstract

In this study of electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem responses (EABRs) elicited by cochlear nucleus stimulation, 3 waves were identified after the initial wave that is directly initiated by the electric stimulus. Varying the rate of periodic stimulation or the interval between pairs of stimuli revealed that the shorter the latency of a wave, the faster it recovered from activation (i.e. shorter refractory period). The slow recovery of the third wave and an accompanying contribution to the second wave could be accounted for by postsynaptic generation in the two medial superior olivary nuclei (MSO); the faster recovery of another contribution to the second wave by generation in an axonal tract bending around the contralateral MSO; and the fastest recovery of the first wave by another axonal pathway having larger axons. Comparison with the relative latencies and spatial distribution of an acoustically-evoked auditory brain-stem response (AABR) indicated that the third wave corresponds to wave V, the second to wave IV (called IVb), and the first to a wave that precedes wave IV (called IVa). The anatomical interpretations for the two later waves of the EABR are consistent with most of the extant data on the neural generators of AABR waves IV and V. Thus, the present data and analysis strengthen the identification of the electrically evoked responses as EABRs and provide a firmer foundation for intra-operative EABR monitoring to assist auditory brain-stem implant placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9714375     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00072-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  4 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring for hearing preservation and restoration in acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  V Colletti; F G Fiorino; M Carner; G Cumer; N Giarbini; L Sacchetto
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  2000

2.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Rohit U Verma; Amélie A Guex; Kenneth E Hancock; Nedim Durakovic; Colette M McKay; Michaël C C Slama; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.

Authors:  Barbara S Herrmann; M Christian Brown; Donald K Eddington; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effect of anesthesia on evoked auditory responses in pediatric auditory brainstem implant surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Wong; Ruwan Kiringoda; Vivek V Kanumuri; Samuel R Barber; Kevin Franck; Nita Sahani; M Christian Brown; Barbara S Herrmann; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.325

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.