Literature DB >> 9714156

Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from an open to closed conformational isomers.

B Sandak1, H J Wolfson, R Nussinov.   

Abstract

Here we dock a ligand onto a receptor surface allowing hinge-bending domain/substructural movements. Our approach mimics and manifests induced fit in molecular recognition. All angular rotations are allowed on the one hand, while a conformational space search is avoided on the other. Rather than dock each of the molecular parts separately with subsequent reconstruction of the consistently docked molecules, all parts are docked simultaneously while still utilizing the position of the hinge from the start. Like pliers closing on a screw, the receptor automatically closes on its ligand in the best surface-matching way. Movements are allowed either in the ligand or in the larger receptor, hence reproducing induced molecular fit. Hinge bending movements are frequently observed when molecules associate. There are numerous examples of open versus closed conformations taking place upon binding. Such movements are observed when the substrate binds to its respective enzyme. In particular, such movements are of interest in allosteric enzymes. The movements can involve entire domains, subdomains, loops, (other) secondary structure elements, or between any groups of atoms connected by flexible joints. We have implemented the hinges at points and at bonds. By allowing 3-dimensional (3-D) rotation at the hinge, several rotations about (consecutive or nearby) bonds are implicitly taken into account. Alternatively, if required, the point rotation can be restricted to bond rotation. Here we illustrate this hinge-bending docking approach and the insight into flexibility it provides on a complex of the calmodulin with its M13 ligand, positioning the hinges either in the ligand or in the larger receptor. This automated and efficient method is adapted from computer vision and robotics. It enables utilizing entire molecular surfaces rather than focusing a priori on active sites. Hence, allows attaining the overall optimally matching surfaces, the extent and type of motions which are involved. Here we do not treat the conformational flexibility of side-chains or of very small pieces of the molecules. Therefore, currently available methods addressing these issues and the method presented here, are complementary to each other, expanding the repertoire of computational docking tools foreseen to aid in studies of recognition, conformational flexibility and drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9714156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  18 in total

1.  Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes.

Authors:  G M Verkhivker; D Bouzida; D K Gehlhaar; P A Rejto; S Arthurs; A B Colson; S T Freer; V Larson; B A Luty; T Marrone; P W Rose
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Maxim Shatsky; Haim J Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Docking validation resources: protein family and ligand flexibility experiments.

Authors:  Sudipto Mukherjee; Trent E Balius; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Association of putative concave protein-binding sites with the fluctuation behavior of residues.

Authors:  Asli Ertekin; Ruth Nussinov; Turkan Haliloglu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Importance of hydrogen-bonding sites in the chiral recognition mechanism between racemic D3 terbium(III) complexes and amino acids.

Authors:  Ahmed Moussa; Christine Pham; Shruthi Bommireddy; Gilles Muller
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.437

6.  New benchmark metrics for protein-protein docking methods.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  PeptiSite: a structural database of peptide binding sites in 4D.

Authors:  Chayan Acharya; Irina Kufareva; Andrey V Ilatovskiy; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Lessons learned in induced fit docking and metadynamics in the Drug Design Data Resource Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Matthew P Baumgartner; David A Evans
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  SnugDock: paratope structural optimization during antibody-antigen docking compensates for errors in antibody homology models.

Authors:  Aroop Sircar; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.