Literature DB >> 9713926

Clinical outcomes of cervical spinal cord injuries without radiographic evidence of trauma.

Y Saruhashi1, S Hukuda, A Katsuura, S Asajima, K Omura.   

Abstract

We investigated 33 cervical spinal cord injury patients (25 males and eight females) without bony injury. Patients whose neurologic recovery had reached a plateau and who had evidence on imaging of persistent spinal cord compression were considered candidates for surgical decompression. When imaging did not show spinal cord compression or patients were maintaining a good neurologic recovery from the early days after injury, we pursued conservative treatment. Age at injury varied from 20 to 76 years (mean, 55.6). Average follow-up was 31 months. Twelve patients were treated conservatively (Group 1). Groups 2 and 3 had surgery. Group 2 (14 cases) had multi-level compression of spinal cord due to pre-existing cervical spine conditions such as ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, cervical canal stenosis, and cervical spondylosis. Group 3 (7 cases) patients existed single-level compression of spinal cord by cervical disc herniations or spondylosis. We evaluated clinical results according to the Frankel classification, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Overall improvement of JOA and ASIA scores after treatment was 56.3 +/- 35.5% and 67.1 +/- 38.0%, respectively. Patients in Group 1 showed very good recovery after conservative treatment, with improvement of JOA and ASIA scores being 70.4 +/- 40.2% and 77.4 +/- 34.2%, respectively. The average interval between injury and operation was 4.3 +/- 4.4 months. The improvement of the surgically treated patients (Groups 2 and 3) in JOA and ASIA score was 48.2 +/- 30.7% and 61.2 +/- 39.6% respectively. We obtained good neurological recovery after operation, with significantly more improvement in Group 3 than in Group 2. No significant neurologic recovery had occurred preoperatively in these groups. In such patients operative intervention is essential for neurologic recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9713926     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Applications of diffusion-weighted MRI in thoracic spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality.

Authors:  Huiyong Shen; Yong Tang; Lin Huang; Rui Yang; Yanfeng Wu; Peng Wang; Yupeng Shi; Xiaoyu He; Hu Liu; Jichao Ye
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

Authors:  Tsunehiko Konomi; Akimasa Yasuda; Kanehiro Fujiyoshi; Junichi Yamane; Shinjiro Kaneko; Takatsugu Komiyama; Masakazu Takemitsu; Yoshiyuki Yato; Osahiko Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Use of Fidji cervical cage in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality.

Authors:  Sheng-Li Huang; Hong-Wei Yan; Kun-Zheng Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Clinical Influence of Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis on Neurological Outcome after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Fracture or Dislocation.

Authors:  Tsuneaki Takao; Seiji Okada; Yuichiro Morishita; Takeshi Maeda; Kensuke Kubota; Ryosuke Ideta; Eiji Mori; Itaru Yugue; Osamu Kawano; Hiroaki Sakai; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  The influence of timing of surgery in the outcome of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA).

Authors:  Can Qi; Hehuan Xia; Dechao Miao; Xingui Wang; Zengyan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.