Literature DB >> 9713301

Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients.

S A McLachlan1, G M Devins, P J Goodwin.   

Abstract

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 has been developed as a quantitative measure of health-related quality of life for use in clinical trials of cancer patients. Validity is an important measurement property of all scientific tests. This study contributes to the iterative process of validating the questionnaire by focusing on the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30, using baseline data from 150 patients participating in a randomised trial of supportive group therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The results provide strong support for the discriminative validity of the global health/quality of life, role function and social function subscales of the QLQ-C30, in patients differing according to clinical criteria. The psychosocial focus of the trial enabled expansion of criteria used to form patient subgroups, beyond medical factors, and consequently support was demonstrated for the discriminative validity of the emotional and cognitive function subscales. The degree of support for these subscales was less substantial than for the other QLQ-C30 subscales as there were fewer relevant criteria. Convergence assessed by correlations with independent measures of psychosocial function provides strong support for the convergent validity of the emotional function, role function and global health/quality of life subscales of the QLQ-C30, and moderate support for the social function subscales. There was little opportunity for the cognitive function subscale to associate with conceptually analogous subscales. Further testing is recommended with more comprehensive and specific measures of cognitive status. In general, the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30 appear to be measuring the concepts they are purported to measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9713301     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10076-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  35 in total

1.  Responsiveness to change [corrected] due to supportive-expressive group therapy, improvement in mood and disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie Lemieux; Dorcas E Beaton; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Louise J Bordeleau; Jon Hunter; Pamela J Goodwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Evaluation of Social Support, Quality of Life, and Body Image in Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Spatuzzi; Anna Vespa; Primo Lorenzi; Guido Miccinesi; Marcello Ricciuti; Wanda Cifarelli; Marina Susi; Tommaso Fabrizio; Maria G Ferrari; Marica Ottaviani; Maria V Giulietti; Fabiana Merico; Michele Aieta
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments.

Authors:  Janneke van Roij; Heidi Fransen; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Myrte Zijlstra; Natasja Raijmakers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Factor analysis of the psychosocial items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in metastatic breast cancer patients participating in a psychosocial intervention study.

Authors:  S A McLachlan; G M Devins; P J Goodwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Long-term effects on cancer survivors' quality of life of physical training versus physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne M May; Irene Korstjens; Ellen van Weert; Bart van den Borne; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Cees P van der Schans; Ilse Mesters; Jan Passchier; Diederick E Grobbee; Wynand J G Ros
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Patrick Dufour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Validation of the cancer needs questionnaire (CNQ) short-form version in an ambulatory cancer setting.

Authors:  T Cossich; P Schofield; S A McLachlan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality of life and need for care in patients with an ostomy: a survey of 2647 patients of the Berlin OStomy-Study (BOSS).

Authors:  Chris Braumann; Verena Müller; Moritz Knies; Birgit Aufmesser; Wolfgang Schwenk; Gerold Koplin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Validation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-C30 from the measurements of five types of inpatients with cancer.

Authors:  C Wan; Q Meng; Z Yang; X Tu; C Feng; X Tang; C Zhang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.