Literature DB >> 9712928

Functional recovery and social outcome after cerebral infarction in young adults.

J P Neau1, P Ingrand, C Mouille-Brachet, M P Rosier, C Couderq, A Alvarez, R Gil.   

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the return to work, the poststroke depression and the quality of life after a cerebral infarction in young adults and was conducted on 71 consecutive young patients (aged 15-45 years) affected by a cerebral infarct who were hospitalized for the first time and discharged at least 1 year before the study. Data about risk factors, etiology, side and territory of stroke, social characteristics of the patient (age, sex, profession, educational level, family situation), poststroke seizures, recurrent stroke, other vascular events, and deaths were collected. Neurological deficits were graded with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale. Poststroke depression (PSD) was quantified using the DSM-IIIR criteria and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Outcomes were rated with the Ranking Scale, the Barthel Index and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Quality of life was assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile. Follow-up information was obtained by interview and neurological examination. Follow-up information was obtained in 65 patients at a mean of 31.7 +/- 13.0 (range 12-59) months, as 2 patients died and 4 were lost to follow-up and were thus excluded from this study. Poststroke seizures occurred in 7 patients (10.8%) and recurrent strokes in 4 patients (6.2%), but none were fatal. The outcome after stroke among survivors was usually good, since more than two-thirds of the patients (69.8%) reported no problem, 11.1% moderate handicap and one-fifth major handicap. Forty-six patients (73%) returned to work: the time period ranging from several days after stroke to 40 months, with a mean of 8 months. However, adjustments in their occupation were necessary for 12 patients (26.1%). PSD was common, since 48.31% of the patients were classified as depressed. PSD was associated with the localization of the infarct (carotid territory), a severe disability, a bad general outcome, and an absence of return to work. Their opinion about their quality of life was negative among approximately 30% of the patients, especially in emotional and alertness behaviors. social interaction, recreation and pastimes. The general outcome after cerebral infarct in young adults is usually good. However, the risk of a PSD is high, and only half of the patients had returned to their previous work. A remaining psychosocial handicap and depression of sexual activity impaired the quality of life. In multivariate analysis, a low NIH score at admission is a significant predictor for return to work, the absence of PSD, and a good quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712928     DOI: 10.1159/000015869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  24 in total

1.  Quality of life amongst young adults with stroke living in Kenya.

Authors:  G Muli; A Rhoda
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Brief psychosocial-behavioral intervention with antidepressant reduces poststroke depression significantly more than usual care with antidepressant: living well with stroke: randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Pamela H Mitchell; Richard C Veith; Kyra J Becker; Ann Buzaitis; Kevin C Cain; Michael Fruin; David Tirschwell; Linda Teri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Aggressive care after a massive stroke in young patients: is that what they want?

Authors:  Kazuma Nakagawa; Matt T Bianchi; Shawn S Nakagawa; Farzaneh A Sorond
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Risk factors, aetiology and outcome of ischaemic stroke in young adults: the Swiss Young Stroke Study (SYSS).

Authors:  Barbara Goeggel Simonetti; Marie-Luise Mono; Uyen Huynh-Do; Patrik Michel; Celine Odier; Roman Sztajzel; Philippe Lyrer; Stefan T Engelter; Leo Bonati; Henrik Gensicke; Christopher Traenka; Barbara Tettenborn; Bruno Weder; Urs Fischer; Aekaterini Galimanis; Simon Jung; Rudolf Luedi; Gian Marco De Marchis; Anja Weck; Carlo W Cereda; Ralf Baumgartner; Claudio L Bassetti; Heinrich P Mattle; Krassen Nedeltchev; Marcel Arnold
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Pair housing reverses post-stroke depressive behavior in mice.

Authors:  Rajkumar Verma; Brett D Friedler; Nia M Harris; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences.

Authors:  Noortje A M M Maaijwee; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Pauline Schaapsmeerders; Ewoud J van Dijk; Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Age-dependent differences in demographics, risk factors, co-morbidity, etiology, management, and clinical outcome of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  M Arnold; M Halpern; N Meier; U Fischer; T Haefeli; L Kappeler; C Brekenfeld; H P Mattle; K Nedeltchev
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Factors affecting the quality of life after ischemic stroke: young versus old patients.

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Smi Choi-Kwon; Sun U Kwon; Hee J Lee; Kyung-Ae Park; Youn S Seo
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Ambient experience in restitutive treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Jill S McClung; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi; Stephen E Nadeau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Depressive disorders in stroke patients.

Authors:  E I Gusev; A N Bogolepova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.