Literature DB >> 9712107

Diclofenac/misoprostol compared with diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Arthrotec Osteoarthritis Study Group.

T S Bocanegra1, A L Weaver, E A Tindall, D H Sikes, J A Ball, C B Wallemark, G S Geis, J G Fort.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gastric (GU) and duodenal ulcers (DU) are common adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Endoscopically diagnosed upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration occurs in about 24% of longterm NSAID users. Coadministration of misoprostol with the NSAID reduces the incidence of NSAID induced GU and DU and their complications. However, compliance is limited by the different dosing regimens of misoprostol and NSAID and GI symptoms associated with misoprostol at its recommended q.i.d. dose. We compared the efficacy, safety, and incidence of endoscopic upper GI ulceration associated with the administration of 2 combinations of diclofenac (50 or 75 mg) and misoprostol 200 microg (D50/M200 t.i.d., D75/M200 b.i.d.), diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d., and placebo in a 6 week, randomized, double blind study in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip.
METHODS: A total of 572 patients with symptomatic OA of the knee or hip and history of GU, DU. or 10 or more erosions were randomized to receive D50/M200 t.i.d., D75/M200 b.i.d., diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d., or placebo for 6 weeks. Arthritis assessments were performed at baseline, 2, and 6 weeks, and upper GI endoscopies at baseline and end of treatment.
RESULTS: All active treatment groups were significantly better than placebo, at all visits, in improving OA symptoms. There were no significant differences in arthritis efficacy between the diclofenac/ misoprostol combinations and diclofenac. However, endoscopically diagnosed GU and/or DU were significantly less frequent in patients receiving D50/M200 t.i.d. (8%), D75/M200 b.i.d. (7%), and placebo (4%) compared to diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. (17%). Adverse events were not different between the active treatment groups, except for higher incidences of flatulence with D75/M200 and diarrhea with D50/M200.
CONCLUSION: Diclofenac 50 mg/misoprostol 200 microg t.i.d. and diclofenac 75 mg/misoprostol 200 microg b.i.d. are as efficacious as diclofenac 75 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of OA, but are associated with a significantly lower incidence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  19 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced diarrhoea.

Authors:  O Chassany; A Michaux; J F Bergmann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Meta-analysis of dropout rates in randomized controlled clinical trials: opioid analgesia for osteoarthritis pain.

Authors:  M Gehling; B Hermann; M Tryba
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  DUEXIS(®) (ibuprofen 800 mg, famotidine 26.6 mg): a new approach to gastroprotection for patients with chronic pain and inflammation who require treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Authors:  Alfonso E Bello
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Gastrointestinal-related healthcare resource usage associated with a fixed combination of diclofenac and misoprostol versus other NSAIDs.

Authors:  E Rahme; L Joseph; S X Kong; D J Watson; J M Pellissier; J LeLorier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Diclofenac/misoprostol. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; H M Lamb
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Economic evaluation of celecoxib, a new cyclo-oxygenase 2 specific inhibitor, in Switzerland.

Authors:  J V Chancellor; E Hunsche; E de Cruz; F P Sarasin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  An economic model for determining the costs and consequences of using various treatment alternatives for the management of arthritis in Canada.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; T A Burke; J Johnson; F Lavoie; C Fitzsimon; R Tretiak; J V Chancellor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Balancing the gastrointestinal benefits and risks of nonselective NSAIDs.

Authors:  David A Peura; Lawrence Goldkind
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 9.  Practical approaches to minimizing gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety concerns with COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs.

Authors:  James M Scheiman; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Assessing the efficacy of famotidine and rebamipide in the treatment of gastric mucosal lesions in patients receiving long-term NSAID therapy (FORCE--famotidine or rebamipide in comparison by endoscopy).

Authors:  Jun-ichi Yamao; Eiryo Kikuchi; Masami Matsumoto; Masaki Nakayama; Tatsuichi Ann; Hideyuki Kojima; Akira Mitoro; Motoyuki Yoshida; Masaaki Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Yajima; Yoshizumi Miyauchi; Hiroshi Ono; Koichi Akiyama; Goro Sakurai; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Ken Haruma; Yoshinori Takakura; Hiroshi Fukui
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.