Literature DB >> 9712015

Brain-behaviour relationships. Some models and related statistical procedures for the study of brain-damaged patients.

O Godefroy1, A Duhamel, X Leclerc, T Saint Michel, H Hénon, D Leys.   

Abstract

The study of brain-damaged patients provides the opportunity to examine the anatomy of brain functions, and has been renewed by the development of structural neuroimaging. Despite the development of neuroimaging and neuropsychological assessment, major uncertainties persist on the exact delimitation of the brain areas involved in specific processes, and these contribute to the enduring controversies over the effective lesions associated with neuropsychological disorders. These uncertainties are mainly due to the methods used in the study of brain-behaviour relationships, which frequently rely on a group comparison design. The aim of this study was to provide models for the study of brain-behaviour relationships and to assess the reliability of related statistical procedures. In the present work, four theoretical modes of brain-behaviour relationship consistent with neuropsychological data are put forward: unicity, equivalence, association and summation. The first experimental study was based on a simulated population of patients. Lesions associated with the occurrence of a deficit were predetermined according to modes of brain-behaviour relationship and were compared with lesions selected by statistical analysis. The study showed that (i) the group comparison design did not allow determination of the effective lesion, (ii) stepwise regression analysis was sensitive to the relative frequency of lesions, especially when the occurrence of a deficit depended on two lesions, but did not allow determination of the mode of brain-behaviour relationship, and (iii) the classification tree test described the data very satisfactorily and permitted the determination of the mode of brain-behaviour relationships. In order to assess the validity of statistical analyses, a second study was performed in which lesion locations associated with motor weakness in stroke patients were examined. Selected lesions were compared with the anatomy of the human motor system. The study mainly showed that (i) the stepwise regression analysis of selected lesions was not related to the presence of a motor deficit, and (ii) the classification tree test provided perfect agreement with motor weakness predicted by lesion locations and suggested an equivalence mode of brain-behaviour relationship consistent with current neurological knowledge. These studies provide models of brain-behaviour relationships and related statistical procedures that may allow more precise documentation of the anatomy of brain functions and its pathology, and further investigation of the modalities of brain-behaviour relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712015     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.8.1545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  18 in total

1.  Functional consequences of a section of the anterior part of the body of the corpus callosum: evidence from an interhemispheric transcallosal approach.

Authors:  Johann Peltier; Martine Roussel; Yasmina Gerard; Maryse Lassonde; Hervé Deramond; Daniel Le Gars; Daniel Le Gars; Louis De Beaumont; Louis De Beaumont; Olivier Godefroy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Quantitative temporal lobe differences: autism distinguished from controls using classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  E Shannon Neeley; Erin D Bigler; Lori Krasny; Sally Ozonoff; William McMahon; Janet E Lainhart
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Prevalence and profile of cognitive impairment in adult glioma: a sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Mathieu Boone; Martine Roussel; Bruno Chauffert; Daniel Le Gars; Olivier Godefroy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Long term motor function after neonatal stroke: Lesion localization above all.

Authors:  Mickael Dinomais; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Samuel Groeschel; Stéphane Chabrier; Matthieu Delion; Béatrice Husson; Manoelle Kossorotoff; Cyrille Renaud; Sylvie Nguyen The Tich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke: the PLORAS system.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Mohamed L Seghier; Alex P Leff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Revisiting 'brain modes' in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations.

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Olivier Godefroy; R Jarrett Rushmore; Melissa Zavaglia; Redwan Maatoug; Claus C Hilgetag; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Reply: Inhibition between human brain areas or methodological artefact?

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Caroline Malherbe; Olivier Godefroy; R Jarrett Rushmore; Melissa Zavaglia; Redwan Maatoug; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Poststroke aphasia : epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Game theoretical mapping of causal interactions underlying visuo-spatial attention in the human brain based on stroke lesions.

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Melissa Zavaglia; Federica Rastelli; Romain Valabrégue; Pascale Pradat-Diehl; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Dissociation between verbal response initiation and suppression after prefrontal lesions.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Volle; Angela de Lacy Costello; Laure M Coates; Catrin McGuire; Karren Towgood; Sam Gilbert; Serge Kinkingnehun; Jane E McNeil; Richard Greenwood; Ben Papps; Martin van den Broeck; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.