Literature DB >> 9711716

Microvascular decompression and percutaneous rhizotomy in trigeminal neuralgia.

K H Lee1, J W Chang, Y G Park, S S Chung.   

Abstract

We analyzed 417 patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD; n = 146) or percutaneous procedures, i.e. radiofrequency rhizotomy (RFR; n = 235) and glycerol rhizotomy (GR; n = 36) between March 1973 and December 1996. MVD and RFR showed the highest rates of initial pain relief (MVD 96.5%; RFR 92.3%; GR 82.8%). RFR and GR had 5.1 and 3.3% rates of facial dysesthesia, respectively, and MVD had the lowest rate (0.3%). Among 9 cases (8.6%) with recurrences after MVD, 8 cases underwent RFR and all of them obtained good long-term results (7.2 years on average). We concluded that MVD is the treatment of choice for tolerant younger patients and should be recommended for patients who desire no sensory deficit. We also determined that radiofrequency rhizotomy is the procedure of choice for patients in whom MVD failed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9711716     DOI: 10.1159/000099923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Long-term follow-up of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Chenur Oesman; Jan Jakob A Mooij
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-09

Review 3.  Comparative evaluation of surgical procedures for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Monika Parmar; Neha Sharma; Vikas Modgill; Purushotham Naidu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-11-29

4.  Pharmacological versus microvascular decompression approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical outcomes and direct costs.

Authors:  Laurinda Lemos; Carlos Alegria; Joana Oliveira; Ana Machado; Pedro Oliveira; Armando Almeida
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Congyang Yan; Qianxi Zhang; Cheng Liu; Jiali Yang; Hu Bian; Jun Zhu; Tongqing Xue
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia: predictors of pain relief, complication avoidance, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Johannes Herta; Tobias Schmied; Theresa Bettina Loidl; Wei-Te Wang; Wolfgang Marik; Fabian Winter; Matthias Tomschik; Heber Ferraz-Leite; Karl Rössler; Christian Dorfer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Long term outcomes of gamma knife radiosurgery for typical trigeminal neuralgia-minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jong Kwon Lee; Hyuk Jai Choi; Hak Cheol Ko; Seok Keun Choi; Young Jin Lim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-05-31

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for trigeminal neuralgia: Cyberknife vs microvascular decompression.

Authors:  Rosanna Tarricone; Giovanni Aguzzi; Francesco Musi; Laura Fariselli; Andrea Casasco
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Perioperative and long-term operative outcomes after surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: microvascular decompression vs percutaneous balloon ablation.

Authors:  W Scott Jellish; William Benedict; Kevin Owen; Douglas Anderson; Elaine Fluder; John F Shea
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.151

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.