PURPOSE:Submaximal aerobic exercise testing is utilized with a variety of populations to assess fitness level and predict maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) when a maximal test is not possible or preferable. Many submaximal tests have been developed on traditional exercise equipment, such as the treadmill and the cycle ergometer, but are not available for newer equipment such as an all-extremity ergometer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a submaximal exercise test using the Pro II Power Trainer, an all-extremity ergometer, in women ages 30-60 without disability and with varying fitness levels. A secondary purpose was to compare VO2peak values achieved during the all-extremity maximal test and the treadmill test. METHODS AND RESULTS: A linear regression equation was developed to predict VO2peak from submaximal data using heart rates and power output at the sixth and ninth minutes of the submaximal test. The linear regression derived for the submaximal all-extremity test was VO2peak L.min-1 = -0.01 (age in years) - 0.0029 (HR 1) - 0.0099 (HR2) - 0.0029 (PO1) + 0.0151(PO2) + 3.010. Predicted residual sum of squares of the linear equation revealed an R2 value of 0.722 and standard error of estimate of 0.216 L.min-1. Treadmill VO2 speak values correlated strongly with all-extremity VO2 speak values (r = 0.918) and were not significantly different (P, 0.05). CONCLUSION: A similar submaximal test needs to be developed for field estimates of VO2peak for subpopulations of individuals with physical disabilities such as rheumatoid arthritis, head or spinal cord injury, cerebral vascular accident, multiple sclerosis, amputation, and cerebral palsy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Submaximal aerobic exercise testing is utilized with a variety of populations to assess fitness level and predict maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) when a maximal test is not possible or preferable. Many submaximal tests have been developed on traditional exercise equipment, such as the treadmill and the cycle ergometer, but are not available for newer equipment such as an all-extremity ergometer. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a submaximal exercise test using the Pro II Power Trainer, an all-extremity ergometer, in women ages 30-60 without disability and with varying fitness levels. A secondary purpose was to compare VO2peak values achieved during the all-extremity maximal test and the treadmill test. METHODS AND RESULTS: A linear regression equation was developed to predict VO2peak from submaximal data using heart rates and power output at the sixth and ninth minutes of the submaximal test. The linear regression derived for the submaximal all-extremity test was VO2peak L.min-1 = -0.01 (age in years) - 0.0029 (HR 1) - 0.0099 (HR2) - 0.0029 (PO1) + 0.0151(PO2) + 3.010. Predicted residual sum of squares of the linear equation revealed an R2 value of 0.722 and standard error of estimate of 0.216 L.min-1. Treadmill VO2 speak values correlated strongly with all-extremity VO2 speak values (r = 0.918) and were not significantly different (P, 0.05). CONCLUSION: A similar submaximal test needs to be developed for field estimates of VO2peak for subpopulations of individuals with physical disabilities such as rheumatoid arthritis, head or spinal cord injury, cerebral vascular accident, multiple sclerosis, amputation, and cerebral palsy.
Authors: Francesco Sartor; Gianluca Vernillo; Helma M de Morree; Alberto G Bonomi; Antonio La Torre; Hans-Peter Kubis; Arsenio Veicsteinas Journal: Sports Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 11.136