Literature DB >> 9710466

Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep.

.   

Abstract

Like many sexually dimorphic ungulates, bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, form sexually segregated groups. Nursery groups include females, lambs and subadult males, while adult males form bachelor groups. Previous hypotheses to account for sexual segregation in ungulates have suggested sexual differences in energy requirements, predation risk and social preferences. I tested the hypothesis that differing nutritional demands, due to sexual dimorphism in body size, would lead to different movement patterns and time budgets. If ruminating/foraging schedules differed according to body size, males and females could not synchronize their activities and therefore would segregate by sex. To test this hypothesis, I observed a population of marked bighorns. I recorded the time males and females spent lying, grazing or walking during 8-14 h of focal-animal observations. Initial and final location of groups and steps taken per minute foraging were also noted. Females spent more time foraging and walking and had longer foraging and walking bouts than adult males, but did not differ in numbers of steps taken while foraging. Males spent more time lying than females. Subadult males switched between nursery and bachelor groups and changed their foraging behaviour depending on the type of group they were in. The distance moved was on average almost four times greater for female than for male groups. I suggest that sexual difference in time budgets and movement patterns make it difficult for males and females to stay in the same group and therefore lead to sexual segregation. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9710466     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  35 in total

1.  Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.

Authors:  Christophe Bonenfant; Leif E Loe; Atle Mysterud; Rolf Langvatn; Nils Chr Stenseth; Jean-Michel Gaillard; François Klein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A reanalysis of the body mass scaling of trampling by large herbivores.

Authors:  N Thompson Hobbs; Kate R Searle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt; Timothy J Roper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Costs and benefits of group living with disease: a case study of pneumonia in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis).

Authors:  Kezia R Manlove; E Frances Cassirer; Paul C Cross; Raina K Plowright; Peter J Hudson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model.

Authors:  L Conradt; T J Roper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Foraging behaviour at multiple temporal scales in a wild alpine equid.

Authors:  Antoine St-Louis; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt; Christian List
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Temperature constraints on foraging behaviour of male Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) in summer.

Authors:  Jean-François Aublet; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Domenico Bergero; Bruno Bassano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Does the Jarman-Bell principle at intra-specific level explain sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates? Sex differences in forage digestibility in Soay sheep.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; E Pérez-Fernández; E Robertson; B Alvarez-Enríquez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Predation risk as a driving force for phenotypic assortment: a cross-population comparison.

Authors:  D P Croft; S K Darden; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.