Literature DB >> 9709745

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with diabetes presenting to an urban public hospital ophthalmology clinic.

R S Baker1, N L Watkins, M R Wilson, M Bazargan, C W Flowers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with diabetes who are newly presenting to an inner city public hospital eye clinic. This study also aims to determine the prevalence and severity of ocular morbidity in this population at time presentation and to assess the adequacy of the ophthalmic surveillance to which this population was exposed before presentation.
DESIGN: A clinic-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 118 consecutive patients with diabetes participated.
METHOD: During a 2-month interval, all patients with diabetes newly presenting to the Los Angeles County King-Drew Medical Center eye clinic were recruited who were at risk for diabetic eye complications according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Each patient underwent a standardized interviewer-administered questionnaire and a comprehensive ophthalmic examination.
RESULTS: Of the 118 patients, 65 (55%) were Hispanic and 51 (43%) were African American. Forty-six percent had a grade school education or less, 91% were unemployed, and 64% had no health insurance. Type two diabetes was predominant (91%), including 24 (22%) of new onset. Thirty-six patients with diabetes (31%) reported duration of diabetes greater than 10 years at time of presentation. At time of presentation, 62% had clinically apparent ophthalmic disease, whereas 40% had advanced ocular disease, including 6.8% of the sample that were legally blind. Sixty-nine patients (58.5%) reported never having had a dilated fundus examination, whereas 31 (63%) of the 49 patients reporting a previous dilated examination were last examined more than 2 years before presentation. Timing of ophthalmic examination was classified as appropriate for 38 patients (32%), marginal for 20 patients (17%), and inappropriate for 60 patients (51%).
CONCLUSION: In the setting of an inner city county hospital eye clinic, where the patient population is predominately minority and of low socioeconomic status, ophthalmic surveillance of high-risk patients with diabetes is inadequate and advanced disease often is present at initial presentation. Strategies must be developed to increase the routine use of eye services within this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9709745     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98015-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  18 in total

1.  Diabetes eye screening in urban settings serving minority populations: detection of diabetic retinopathy and other ocular findings using telemedicine.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; David J Lee; Byron L Lam; David S Friedman; Emily W Gower; Julia A Haller; Lisa A Hark; Jinan Saaddine
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Coagulation pathways and diabetic retinopathy: abnormal modulation in a selected group of insulin dependent diabetic patients.

Authors:  C Giusti; R Schiaffini; C Brufani; A Pantaleo; E M Vingolo; P Gargiulo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Understanding the Knowledge Gap Experienced by U.S. Safety Net Patients in Teleretinal Screening.

Authors:  Sheba M George; Erin Moran Hayes; Allison Fish; Lauren Patty Daskivich; Omolola I Ogunyemi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Workflow concerns and workarounds of readers in an urban safety net teleretinal screening study.

Authors:  Allison Fish; Sheba George; Elizabeth Terrien; Alicia Eccles; Richard Baker; Omolola Ogunyemi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  Quantification of Retinal Nonperfusion and Neovascularization With Ultrawidefield Fluorescein Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Associated Characteristics of Advanced Disease.

Authors:  Gina Yu; Michael T Aaberg; Tapan P Patel; Rahul S Iyengar; Corey Powell; Annie Tran; Caitlin Miranda; Emma Young; Katarina Demetriou; Laxmi Devisetty; Yannis M Paulus
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  An ethno-medical perspective on research participation: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Richard S Baker; Horacio Fabrega; José G Conde; Ron D Hays; Erik Fleming; Keith Norris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-04-25

7.  Pre-experience perceptions about telemedicine among African Americans and Latinos in South Central Los Angeles.

Authors:  Sheba M George; Alison Hamilton; Richard Baker
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors--an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Arleen Brown; Jane A Cauley; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Catherine Kim; Julie Ann Sosa; Anne E Sumner; Blair Anton
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Teleretinal screening for diabetic retinopathy in six Los Angeles urban safety-net clinics: initial findings.

Authors:  Omolola Ogunyemi; Elizabeth Terrien; Alicia Eccles; Lauren Patty; Sheba George; Allison Fish; Senait Teklehaimanot; Ramarao Ilapakurthi; Otaren Aimiuwu; Richard Baker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

10.  Teleretinal screening for diabetic retinopathy in six Los Angeles urban safety-net clinics: final study results.

Authors:  Omolola Ogunyemi; Sheba George; Lauren Patty; Senait Teklehaimanot; Richard Baker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.