Literature DB >> 9709352

Use of resuscitation skills by paramedics caring for critically injured children in Oregon.

E Su1, N C Mann, M McCall, J R Hedges.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To perform a statewide analysis of the frequency of major pediatric trauma cases and the use of resuscitation skills by paramedics (EMT-Ps). 2) To determine whether EMT-Ps use resuscitation skills less frequently for injured children than for older patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective, database analysis of major trauma cases. SETTING AND POPULATION: 1995 statewide trauma registry data for patients with EMT-P scene care. OBSERVATIONS: The database included patient demographics, field vital signs, field procedures [e.g., intravenous (i.v.) line placement, chest compressions, needle thoracostomy, endotracheal intubation], field medication, and vital signs at ED presentation. DATA ANALYSIS: Patients aged < or = 12 years ("pediatric") were compared with those aged > 12 years ("older"). Analyses of patients with tachycardia, hypotension, and obtundation were performed using chi 2 analysis (alpha = 0.05).
RESULTS: Of 3,502 trauma patients managed by an EMT-P, only 297 (8%) were aged < or = 12 years. Fewer pediatric patients (18%) than adults (27%) had an injury severity scale score > or = 16, p < 0.005. The frequency of most resuscitation skills and the administration of medications were not statistically different between patient groups. However, i.v.s were four times more likely to be placed in adults (76%) than in pediatric patients (42%), p < 0.001. Subanalyses indicated fewer pediatric patients with tachycardia (p = 0.02) or hypotension (p = 0.02) received an i.v., compared with adults who had similar physiologic parameters. Obtunded patients were equally likely to receive endotracheal intubation, although the procedure was rarely used (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: EMT-Ps infrequently manage seriously injured children. i.v.s are less frequently placed in pediatric trauma patients, even in the setting of physiologic abnormalities. The contributions of these field procedures to patient outcomes should be evaluated further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709352     DOI: 10.1080/10903129708958803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  3 in total

1.  Prehospital emergency care for children.

Authors:  F Jewkes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Prehospital management of the acutely ill child.

Authors:  F Jewkes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  [Vascular access in emergency paediatric anaesthesia].

Authors:  E-M Jordi Ritz; T O Erb; F J Frei
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.