Literature DB >> 9709279

Variation in the effectiveness of breast screening by year of follow-up.

B Cox1.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of breast screening by year from the start of screening for women aged 40-49 at study entry. Data from previous randomized controlled trials on breast cancer screening were combined, and cumulative and yearly breast cancer mortality rates and relative risks (RRs) were calculated for women offered screening compared to those not offered screening. At 7 years of follow-up, no reduction in breast cancer mortality from screening starting at ages 40-49 was found. At 10 years of follow-up, a nonsignificant reduction in breast cancer mortality was seen for women aged 40-49 at entry (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.77-1.11). A nonsignificant excess of breast cancer mortality in those offered screening aged 40-49 was observed during the early years of follow-up in several trials. While the favorable effect of screening was observed within the first 5 years of study entry for women aged 50 or more, no similar effect was seen for women aged 40-49. The delayed effect for the 40-49 cohort may be attributable to 1) a biological difference in the effects of screening, which may be related to the onset of menopause, and 2) screening that occurred when women were aged 50 or more rather than before that age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709279     DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  7 in total

1.  A Probabilistic Model to Support Radiologists' Classification Decisions in Mammography Practice.

Authors:  Jiaming Zeng; Francisco Gimenez; Elizabeth S Burnside; Daniel L Rubin; Ross Shachter
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women.

Authors:  Tom Marshall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Consensus recommendations for advancing breast cancer: risk identification and screening in ethnically diverse younger women.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Thomas A Summers; John Eberhardt; Albert Cerussi; Warren Grundfest; Charles M Peterson; Michael Brazaitis; Elizabeth Krupinski; Harold Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Global breast cancer: the lessons to bring home.

Authors:  Silvia C Formenti; Alan A Arslan; Susan M Love
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-05

Review 5.  Recent translational research: computational studies of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Retsky; Romano Demicheli; William Hrushesky; John Speer; Douglas Swartzendruber; Robert Wardwell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

7.  Rational and irrational issues in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Cornelia J Baines
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.