Literature DB >> 9709042

A comparison of nebulized budesonide, intramuscular dexamethasone, and placebo for moderately severe croup.

D W Johnson1, S Jacobson, P C Edney, P Hadfield, M E Mundy, S Schuh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In children with croup, treatment with nebulized budesonide decreases symptoms, but it is uncertain how budesonide compares with dexamethasone, the conventional therapy for croup, and whether either reduces the rate of hospitalization.
METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized trial involving 144 children with moderately severe croup. The children were treated with racepinephrine and a single dose of 4 mg of nebulized budesonide (48 children), 0.6 mg of intramuscular dexamethasone per kilogram of body weight (47 children), or placebo (49 children). The children were assessed before treatment and then hourly for five hours after treatment. Physicians who were unaware of the treatment assignments determined the children's need for further treatment and hospitalization.
RESULTS: The characteristics of the groups were similar at base line, including the types of viruses identified, the types of croup, and the clinical severity of the illness. The overall rates of hospitalization were 71 percent in the placebo group (35 of 49 children), 38 percent in the budesonide group (18 of 48 children), and 23 percent in the dexamethasone group (11 of 47 children) (unadjusted P=0.001 for the comparison of budesonide with placebo, P<0.001 for the comparison of dexamethasone with placebo, and P=0.18 for the comparison of budesonide with dexamethasone). Children treated with budesonide or dexamethasone had a greater improvement in croup scores than those given placebo (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively), and those treated with dexamethasone had a greater improvement than those treated with budesonide (P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: In children with moderately severe croup, treatment with intramuscular dexamethasone or nebulized budesonide resulted in more rapid clinical improvement than did the administration of placebo, with dexamethasone offering the greatest improvement. Treatment with either glucocorticoid resulted in fewer hospitalizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9709042     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199808203390802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  27 in total

1.  Role of steroids in treatment of croup.

Authors:  K Chugh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Update on the utility of corticosteroids in acute pediatric respiratory disorders.

Authors:  Avraham Beigelman; Bradley E Chipps; Leonard B Bacharier
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  Historical review of croup.

Authors:  V Marchessault
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-11

4.  Re: Croup in the paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Candice L Bjornson; David W Johnson
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Response to 'Benefits of glucocorticoids in the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children: End of the controversy?'.

Authors:  James D Kellner
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Croup in children.

Authors:  Candice L Bjornson; David W Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Historical review of croup.

Authors:  V Marchessault
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Glucocorticoids in the treatment of croup: barking up the right tree.

Authors:  T P Klassen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Croup.

Authors:  David Wyatt Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-09-29

Review 10.  Croup.

Authors:  David Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.