Relative contribution of low-density lipoprotein receptor and lipoprotein lipase gene mutations to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease among French Canadians.

Men with low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at high risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The dyslipidemic state found among patients who are heterozygous for mutations in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene may also increase the risk of CAD. In the present study, the association of the heterozygous forms of low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing FH as well as of LPL gene mutations causing (P207L and G188E) or not causing (D9N and N291S) complete loss of LPL activity with angiographically assessed CAD was estimated in a cohort of 412 French Canadian men aged <60 years who consecutively underwent coronary angiography for the investigation of retrosternal pain. The frequency of FH as well as of LPL gene mutations tended to increase with the number of narrowed coronary arteries. However, CAD occurred earlier in FH patients than in partly LPL-deficient patients. Indeed, the proportion of men affected by FH was of 16.4% in those <45 years of age, and solely 4.3% among those between 56 and 60 years of age (p <0.0001). In contrast, the LPL gene defect was found in only 4.0% of men aged <45 years, whereas this prevalence reached 8.3% among those aged 56 to 60 years. In multivariate analyses, the association of LPL with CAD was not independent of age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and other covariates included at baseline, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene. In contrast, FH was associated with CAD with minimal contribution of other cardiovascular risk factors. However, the relation between FH and CAD was at least partly dependent on plasma apolipoprotein B concentrations. In the different regression models, fasting insulin and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were important covariates of CAD, whether or not patients were affected by FH or LPL deficiency. In conclusion, the association of LPL gene mutations with CAD was delayed compared with FH, appeared to be markedly exacerbated by the presence of additional risk factors, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene.