OBJECTIVE: To address the question of whether individuals with chronic HIV-1 infection have a stable viral load set-point and to assess the influence of host and viral factors on the evolution of viral load in a subset of stable asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load below 5000 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell count above 500 x 10(6)/l. METHODS: Medical visits were performed at least every 6 months including routine blood analysis, viral load and CD4+ T-cell count. HIV-1 RNA was measured in frozen (-70 degrees C) plasma samples using PCR. Patients were classified into three groups according to baseline viral load: group A, < 200 copies/ml (undetectable); group B, 201-2000 copies/ml; group C, 2001-5000 copies/ml. A survival analysis and a Cox regression model were performed to assess the influence of viral and host factors in the increase of baseline viral load. The endpoint was the time to increase viral load to a stable level > 0.5 log10 copies/ml above baseline viral load in groups B and C and to a stable detectable viral load (> 200 copies/ml) in group A. RESULTS: A cohort of 114 patients with viral load below 5000 copies/ml was followed for a median of 12 months (6-42 months). Overall, 22 (19%) out of 114 patients had an increase > 0.5 log10 copies/ml of baseline viral load. Baseline viral load increased in two (5%) out of 37 patients in group A, four (12%) out of 33 patients in group B, and 16 (36%) out of 44 patients in group C (survival analysis, P<0.002). Patients of group C had a eightfold higher risk of increasing baseline viral load than patients in the other two groups pooled together (hazards ratio, 8.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-38; P = 0.006). Patients with an increase of viral load to the virological endpoint had a threefold higher risk of decreasing baseline CD4+ T-cell counts > 100 x 10(6)/I than patients with stable viral load (hazards ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-14; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of chronically HIV-1-infected asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load < 5000 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count > 500 x 10(6)/l, a true viral load set-point did not seem to exist. Patients with baseline viral load of 2000-5000 copies/ml had an eightfold higher risk of increasing the level of viral load than patients with a baseline viral load below 2000 copies/ml.
OBJECTIVE: To address the question of whether individuals with chronic HIV-1 infection have a stable viral load set-point and to assess the influence of host and viral factors on the evolution of viral load in a subset of stable asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load below 5000 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell count above 500 x 10(6)/l. METHODS: Medical visits were performed at least every 6 months including routine blood analysis, viral load and CD4+ T-cell count. HIV-1 RNA was measured in frozen (-70 degrees C) plasma samples using PCR. Patients were classified into three groups according to baseline viral load: group A, < 200 copies/ml (undetectable); group B, 201-2000 copies/ml; group C, 2001-5000 copies/ml. A survival analysis and a Cox regression model were performed to assess the influence of viral and host factors in the increase of baseline viral load. The endpoint was the time to increase viral load to a stable level > 0.5 log10 copies/ml above baseline viral load in groups B and C and to a stable detectable viral load (> 200 copies/ml) in group A. RESULTS: A cohort of 114 patients with viral load below 5000 copies/ml was followed for a median of 12 months (6-42 months). Overall, 22 (19%) out of 114 patients had an increase > 0.5 log10 copies/ml of baseline viral load. Baseline viral load increased in two (5%) out of 37 patients in group A, four (12%) out of 33 patients in group B, and 16 (36%) out of 44 patients in group C (survival analysis, P<0.002). Patients of group C had a eightfold higher risk of increasing baseline viral load than patients in the other two groups pooled together (hazards ratio, 8.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-38; P = 0.006). Patients with an increase of viral load to the virological endpoint had a threefold higher risk of decreasing baseline CD4+ T-cell counts > 100 x 10(6)/I than patients with stable viral load (hazards ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-14; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of chronically HIV-1-infected asymptomatic patients with a baseline viral load < 5000 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count > 500 x 10(6)/l, a true viral load set-point did not seem to exist. Patients with baseline viral load of 2000-5000 copies/ml had an eightfold higher risk of increasing the level of viral load than patients with a baseline viral load below 2000 copies/ml.
Authors: R A Arnaout; A L Lloyd; T R O'Brien; J J Goedert; J M Leonard; M A Nowak Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-09-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ronald B Geskus; Maria Prins; Jean-Baptiste Hubert; Frank Miedema; Ben Berkhout; Christine Rouzioux; Jean-Francois Delfraissy; Laurence Meyer Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 4.602