Literature DB >> 9705474

Codes for sound-source location in nontonotopic auditory cortex.

J C Middlebrooks1, L Xu, A C Eddins, D M Green.   

Abstract

We evaluated two hypothetical codes for sound-source location in the auditory cortex. The topographical code assumed that single neurons are selective for particular locations and that sound-source locations are coded by the cortical location of small populations of maximally activated neurons. The distributed code assumed that the responses of individual neurons can carry information about locations throughout 360 degrees of azimuth and that accurate sound localization derives from information that is distributed across large populations of such panoramic neurons. We recorded from single units in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus area (area AES) and in area A2 of alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cats. Results obtained in the two areas were essentially equivalent. Noise bursts were presented from loudspeakers spaced in 20 degrees intervals of azimuth throughout 360 degrees of the horizontal plane. Spike counts of the majority of units were modulated >50% by changes in sound-source azimuth. Nevertheless, sound-source locations that produced greater than half-maximal spike counts often spanned >180 degrees of azimuth. The spatial selectivity of units tended to broaden and, often, to shift in azimuth as sound pressure levels (SPLs) were increased to a moderate level. We sometimes saw systematic changes in spatial tuning along segments of electrode tracks as long as 1.5 mm but such progressions were not evident at higher sound levels. Moderate-level sounds presented anywhere in the contralateral hemifield produced greater than half-maximal activation of nearly all units. These results are not consistent with the hypothesis of a topographic code. We used an artificial-neural-network algorithm to recognize spike patterns and, thereby, infer the locations of sound sources. Network input consisted of spike density functions formed by averages of responses to eight stimulus repetitions. Information carried in the responses of single units permitted reasonable estimates of sound-source locations throughout 360 degrees of azimuth. The most accurate units exhibited median errors in localization of <25 degrees, meaning that the network output fell within 25 degrees of the correct location on half of the trials. Spike patterns tended to vary with stimulus SPL, but level-invariant features of patterns permitted estimates of locations of sound sources that varied through 20-dB ranges. Sound localization based on spike patterns that preserved details of spike timing consistently was more accurate than localization based on spike counts alone. These results support the hypothesis that sound-source locations are represented by a distributed code and that individual neurons are, in effect, panoramic localizers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9705474     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

1.  Encoding of tactile stimulus location by somatosensory thalamocortical ensembles.

Authors:  A A Ghazanfar; C R Stambaugh; M A Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial processing in the auditory cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  GABA shapes a systematic map of binaural sensitivity in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Encoding stimulus information by spike numbers and mean response time in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Gal Chechik; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Spatial heterogeneity of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Brian N Carriere; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Coding of FM sweep trains and twitter calls in area CM of marmoset auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Lisa A de la Mothe; Suzanne Blumell; Susanne J Sterbing-D'Angelo; William D'Angelo; Corrie R Camalier; Troy A Hackett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington; G Christopher Stecker; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A rate code for sound azimuth in monkey auditory cortex: implications for human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Uri Werner-Reiss; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural population encoding and decoding of sound source location across sound level in the rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.