Literature DB >> 9705461

Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. III. Responses To translation.

D E Angelaki1.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3-D) properties of the translational vestibulo-ocular reflexes (translational VORs) during lateral and fore-aft oscillations in complete darkness were studied in rhesus monkeys at frequencies between 0.16 and 25 Hz. In addition, constant velocity off-vertical axis rotations extended the frequency range to 0.02 Hz. During lateral motion, horizontal responses were in phase with linear velocity in the frequency range of 2-10 Hz. At both lower and higher frequencies, phase lags were introduced. Torsional response phase changed more than 180 degrees in the tested frequency range such that torsional eye movements, which could be regarded as compensatory to "an apparent roll tilt" at the lowest frequencies, became anticompensatory at all frequencies above approximately 1 Hz. These results suggest two functionally different frequency bandwidths for the translational VORs. In the low-frequency spectrum (<<0.5 Hz), horizontal responses compensatory to translation are small and high-pass-filtered whereas torsional response sensitivity is relatively frequency independent. At higher frequencies however, both horizontal and torsional response sensitivity and phase exhibit a similar frequency dependence, suggesting a common role during head translation. During up-down motion, vertical responses were in phase with translational velocity at 3-5 Hz but phase leads progressively increased for lower frequencies (>90 degrees at frequencies <0.2 Hz). No consistent dependence on static head orientation was observed for the vertical response components during up-down motion and the horizontal and torsional response components during lateral translation. The frequency response characteristics of the translational VORs were fitted by "periphery/brain stem" functions that related the linear acceleration input, transduced by primary otolith afferents, to the velocity signals providing the input to the velocity-to-position neural integrator and the oculomotor plant. The lowest-order, best-fit periphery/brain stem model that approximated the frequency dependence of the data consisted of a second order transfer function with two alternating poles (at 0.4 and 7.2 Hz) and zeros (at 0.035 and 3.4 Hz). In addition to clearly differentiator dynamics at low frequencies (less than approximately 0.5 Hz), there was no frequency bandwidth where the periphery/brain stem function could be approximated by an integrator, as previously suggested. In this scheme, the oculomotor plant dynamics are assumed to perform the necessary high-frequency integration as required by the reflex. The detailed frequency dependence of the data could only be precisely described by higher order functions with nonminimum phase characteristics that preclude simple filtering of afferent inputs and might be suggestive of distributed spatiotemporal processing of otolith signals in the translational VORs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9705461     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Differential sensorimotor processing of vestibulo-ocular signals during rotation and translation.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; A M Green; J D Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp; Douglas B Tweed; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Does orbital proprioception contribute to gaze stability during translation?

Authors:  Min Wei; Nan Lin; Shawn D Newlands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Frequency-dependent spatiotemporal tuning properties of non-eye movement related vestibular neurons to three-dimensional translations in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Chiju Chen-Huang; Barry W Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Spatial coding capacity of central otolith neurons.

Authors:  Ying-Shing Chan; Chun-Hong Lai; Daisy Kwok-Yan Shum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vertical eye position responses to steady-state sinusoidal fore-aft head translation in monkeys.

Authors:  Yoshiro Wada; Yasushi Kodaka; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Optokinetic and vestibular responsiveness in the macaque rostral vestibular and fastigial nuclei.

Authors:  Ayanna S Bryan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Canal and otolith contributions to compensatory tilt responses in pigeons.

Authors:  Kimberly L McArthur; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Diversity of vestibular nuclei neurons targeted by cerebellar nodulus inhibition.

Authors:  Hui Meng; Pablo M Blázquez; J David Dickman; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.