Literature DB >> 9705043

Accuracy and precision of blood pressure determination with the Finapres: an overview using re-sampling statistics.

B Silke1, D McAuley.   

Abstract

The Finapres non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitor uses the method of Penaz to indirectly record the arterial waveform; studies on its accuracy have suggested little systematic bias vs intra-arterial pressure (IAP) but substantial variability. Inconsistency between studies, in respect of the magnitude, direction and variance of bias, was described in the validation studies against the direct IAP. We have employed a novel re-sampling statistical method to combine the data from 20 published studies; a robust overall estimate of the accuracy and precision of the Finapres was thereby obtained. Based on 449 patients and 4490 re-samples, the average Finapres systolic bias (IAP- Finapres) was 2.2 mm Hg (s.d.+/-12.4) with limits of agreement (bias+/-2 s.d.) of -22.6 and 26.9 mm Hg. The average precision was 12.1 mm Hg (s.d.+/-8.4). The Finapres diastolic bias was -0.3 mm Hg (s.d.+/-7.9) with the limits of agreement of -16.1 and 15.5 mm Hg. The average precision was 7.6 mm Hg (s.d.+/-5.3). The average Finapres mean arterial pressure bias was 2.1 mm Hg (s.d.+/-8.6) with precision of 7.6 mm Hg (s.d.+/-5.3). The calculated percentage of Finapres systolic values expected to fall within +/-5 or +/-10 of the direct intra-arterial pressure was 35.9% and 73.1%, respectively. The calculated precision of the Finapres systolic pressure between 0-5 mm Hg was 1.6% and between 0-10 mm Hg 36.4%. The comparable values for Finapres diastolic BP for accuracy were 63.5% and 92.8% and for precision 23.1% and 79.2%. The Finapres device can provide an accurate estimate of diastolic and mean arterial pressure compared with the intra-arterial record; the apparent inaccuracy of the Finapres systolic pressure may have a physiological explanation. When the Finapres device is used in experimental or in clinical situations, then calibration against a reliable reference arterial pressure is desirable to obviate the possibility of an 'offset' error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9705043     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  18 in total

1.  Joint symbolic dynamic analysis of beat-to-beat interactions of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  M Baumert; T Walther; J Hopfe; H Stepan; R Faber; A Voss
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Changes of elastic properties of central arteries during acute static exercise and lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Charalampos Lydakis; Afsana Momen; Cheryl Blaha; Michael Herr; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Dynamic cerebral autoregulation assessment using chaotic analysis in diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

Authors:  Ben-Yi Liau; Shoou-Jeng Yeh; Chuang-Chien Chiu; Yu-Chou Tsai
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Validity of auscultatory and Penaz blood pressure measurements during profound heat stress alone and with an orthostatic challenge.

Authors:  Matthew S Ganio; R Matthew Brothers; Rebekah A I Lucas; Jeffrey L Hastings; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Near-infrared spectroscopy determined cerebral oxygenation with eliminated skin blood flow in young males.

Authors:  Ai Hirasawa; Takahito Kaneko; Naoki Tanaka; Tsukasa Funane; Masashi Kiguchi; Henrik Sørensen; Niels H Secher; Shigehiko Ogoh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Haemodynamic responses to salbutamol and isometric exercise are altered in young adults with mild asthma.

Authors:  W Stephen Waring; Rachel B Leigh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Orthostatic hypotension: framework of the syndrome.

Authors:  Jochanan E Naschitz; Itzhak Rosner
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring of tachycardic episodes during interventional electrophysiology.

Authors:  Roberto Maggi; Valentina Viscardi; Toshiyuki Furukawa; Michele Brignole
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: Theory and Practice.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Jin-Oh Hahn; Omer T Inan; Lalit K Mestha; Chang-Sei Kim; Hakan Töreyin; Survi Kyal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Changes in heart rate and blood pressure during nocturnal hot flashes associated with and without awakenings.

Authors:  Fiona C Baker; Mohamad Forouzanfar; Aimée Goldstone; Stephanie A Claudatos; Harold Javitz; John Trinder; Massimiliano De Zambotti
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.