Literature DB >> 9704684

Serial creatinine kinase (CK) MB testing during the emergency department evaluation of chest pain: utility of a 2-hour deltaCK-MB of +1.6ng/ml.

F M Fesmire1, R F Percy, J B Bardoner, D R Wharton, F B Calhoun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods of using creatinine kinase (CK)-MB to diagnose acute myocardial necrosis rely on the total CK-MB exceeding a threshold of normalcy before being considered diagnostic. Because the CK-MB rapid immunoassay is both sensitive and precise, a small difference between two serial samples over an appropriate time interval may result in an increased sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with traditional methods if an appropriate cutoff value is chosen. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline and 2-hour CK-MB immunoassay measurements were performed in 710 patients with chest pain whose baseline CK-MB was less than two times upper limits of normal (<12 ng/ml) to determine whether a rise in CK-MB > or =+1.6 ng/ml is more sensitive and specific than an abnormal 2-hour CK-MB in the detection of patients with AMI during the initial emergency department evaluation of chest pain. The baseline (MBO) or 2-hour (MB2) CK-MB was considered positive if the CK-MB level was > or =6 ng/ml. MBdelta was defined as the difference of MB2 and MBO and was considered positive if the value was > or =+1.6 ng/ml. A positive MB2 was more sensitive for the detection of AMI (75.2% vs 17.7%; p < 0.0001) than a positive MBO. A positive MBdelta was more sensitive for the detection of AMI (93.8% vs 75.2%; p < 0.0001 ) than a positive MB2. There were no statistically significant differences in specificities for AMI for any test modality.
CONCLUSIONS: A rise in CK-MB of > or =+ 1.6 ng/ml in 2 hours is a useful marker of AMI during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9704684     DOI: 10.1053/hj.1998.v136.89571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Safe discharge from the cardiac emergency room with a rapid rule-out myocardial infarction protocol using serial CK-MB(mass).

Authors:  R Bholasingh; R J de Winter; J C Fischer; R W Koster; R J Peters; G T Sanders
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital.

Authors:  S W Goodacre; F M Morris; S Campbell; J Arnold; K Angelini
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost effective at my hospital? Extrapolation of data from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Goodacre; S Dixon
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Jon Nicholl; Simon Dixon; Elizabeth Cross; Karen Angelini; Jane Arnold; Sue Revill; Tom Locker; Simon J Capewell; Deborah Quinney; Stephen Campbell; Francis Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-14

5.  Which diagnostic tests are most useful in a chest pain unit protocol?

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Thomas Locker; Jane Arnold; Karen Angelini; Francis Morris
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2005-08-25

6.  Impact of an abbreviated cardiac enzyme protocol to aid rapid discharge of patients with cocaine-associated chest pain in the clinical decision unit.

Authors:  Faheem W Guirgis; Kelly Gray-Eurom; Teri L Mayfield; David M Imbt; Colleen J Kalynych; Dale F Kraemer; Steven A Godwin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.