Literature DB >> 9704305

Tampon use in young women.

H A Omar1, S Aggarwal, K C Perkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of tampon use among young females, the factors and persons influencing this choice, the role of primary care physicians, and the potential association of tampon use with sexually transmitted diseases and urinary tract infections.
METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire regarding the use of feminine hygiene products was completed by 250 female college students between 17 and 21 years of age and 90 primary care physicians. Percentages were calculated for most outcome measurements and Fisher's Probability Exact Test was used to compare groups.
RESULTS: Of the participants, 19% use pads, 29% use tampons, and 52% use both, with a total of 81% using tampons alone or in combination. The choice was influenced mostly by the woman herself or her mother. Only 22% reported that their physician discussed tampon usage with them. Incidence of sexually transmitted diseases was not significantly different between those using pads and tampons. In the pad group, 12% reported urinary tract infections versus 32% in the other group (P = 0.007). Among physicians, only 30% said they discussed hygiene products, although 52% of them thought it was medically important. Of the female physicians, 71% use tampons alone or in combination; 29% exclusively use pads, with 92% citing fear of toxic shock syndrome as a reason for their choice.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of young women use tampons based on own decision or maternal influence for comfort, convenience, and appearance. Physician input in this regard is not routinely provided, probably because of lack of agreement about the importance of the subject among physicians. Based on participants' report in this survey, the incidence of urinary tract infections seems to be significantly higher among tampon users than among pad users. Physicians should assume a more active role in explaining the appropriate use, benefits, and potential risks of feminine hygiene products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9704305     DOI: 10.1016/s1083-3188(98)70134-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  6 in total

1.  FLOW (finding lasting options for women): multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing tampons with menstrual cups.

Authors:  Courtney Howard; Caren Lee Rose; Konia Trouton; Holly Stamm; Danielle Marentette; Nicole Kirkpatrick; Sanja Karalic; Renee Fernandez; Julie Paget
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Urinary tract infections in adult general practice patients.

Authors:  Eva Hummers-Pradier; Michael M Kochen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Acceptability of sexually transmitted infection testing using self-collected vaginal swabs among college women.

Authors:  Robyn L Fielder; Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2013

4.  Impact of Advertising on Tampon Wear-time Practices.

Authors:  Kara E Woeller; Kenneth W Miller; Amy L Robertson-Smith; Lisa C Bohman
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-29

5.  Association of characteristics of tampon use with menstrual toxic shock syndrome in France.

Authors:  Amaury Billon; Marie-Paule Gustin; Anne Tristan; Thomas Bénet; Julien Berthiller; Claude Alexandre Gustave; Philippe Vanhems; Gerard Lina
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  A systematic review of the menstrual experiences of university students and the impacts on their education: A global perspective.

Authors:  Alana K Munro; Erin C Hunter; Syeda Z Hossain; Melanie Keep
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.