RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compare the usefulness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantitation of atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic rabbits, correlated with histopathology. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging with T1- and T2-weighted spin echo sequences and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography of the abdominal aorta was performed on seven rabbits using a 1.5 T MR imager and a standard head coil. X-ray angiography and IVUS examination (3.5 F/30 MHz imaging catheter) was performed via carotid artery access. RESULTS: Time-of-flight MR angiography source images provided the best resolution and plaque-lumen contrast in visual comparison between the different MRI sequences. Intra- and interobserver reproducibilities of the lesion thickness and area measurements were similar in IVUS and MRI (Pearson correlations 0.52-0.97; P < 0.01). The measurements from IVUS and MRI correlated closely with each other as well as with those made from histopathologic specimens (Pearson correlations 0.50-0.79; P < 0.001). The measurements from IVUS were somewhat more accurate than those made from MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Both MRI and IVUS with clinically available imaging equipments are feasible and accurate for the quantitation of experimental atherosclerosis of rabbit aorta.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compare the usefulness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantitation of atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic rabbits, correlated with histopathology. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging with T1- and T2-weighted spin echo sequences and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography of the abdominal aorta was performed on seven rabbits using a 1.5 T MR imager and a standard head coil. X-ray angiography and IVUS examination (3.5 F/30 MHz imaging catheter) was performed via carotid artery access. RESULTS: Time-of-flight MR angiography source images provided the best resolution and plaque-lumen contrast in visual comparison between the different MRI sequences. Intra- and interobserver reproducibilities of the lesion thickness and area measurements were similar in IVUS and MRI (Pearson correlations 0.52-0.97; P < 0.01). The measurements from IVUS and MRI correlated closely with each other as well as with those made from histopathologic specimens (Pearson correlations 0.50-0.79; P < 0.001). The measurements from IVUS were somewhat more accurate than those made from MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Both MRI and IVUS with clinically available imaging equipments are feasible and accurate for the quantitation of experimental atherosclerosis of rabbit aorta.