Literature DB >> 9703964

Strain differences in cytochrome P4501A1 gene expression caused by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat liver: role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its nuclear translocator.

N R Jana1, S Sarkar, J Yonemoto, C Tohyama, H Sone.   

Abstract

Rat strain variation in hepatic cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) gene expression caused by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was investigated along with possible underlying mechanism. TCDD at a single oral dose of 13.5 ng/kg body weight significantly increased hepatic CYP1A1 mRNA expression in DRH, Long-Evans Cinamon (LEC), Long-Evans (LE), and Holtzman (HO) rats, but not in Sprague-Dawley (SD), Wistar-Imamichi (WI), Lewis (LEW), and Fisher-344 (F344) strains. All showed significant induction of CYP1A1 mRNA at a dose of 40 ng/kg, the relative levels decreasing in the order DRH, LEC, HO, LE, F344, WI, LEW, and SD. A more than 35-fold difference in the induction of CYP1A1 RNA was evident between the DRH and SD strains. Based on CYP1A1 induction, classification into two distinctly separate groups was possible, high responders (DRH, LEC, HO, and LE) and low responders (SD, LEW, WI, and F344). The expression levels closely correlated with the steady-state aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) mRNA expression, this being approximately four-fold higher in the high than in the low responder group. Analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) showed the presence of a wild type as well as an alternately spliced variant in all strains, with a 45-bp deletion whose sequence corresponded to part of 5' end of the basic region of the basic helix-loop-helix domain. Expressed levels of both products were almost equal in all the strains except DRH, LEC and HO, where the wild form predominated. The results suggest that differential expression of both AhR and ARNT are responsible for rat strain-specific differences in TCDD induced CYP1A1 expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9703964     DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  6 in total

1.  Transcript variations, phylogenetic tree and chromosomal localization of porcine aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) genes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Sadowska; Lukasz Paukszto; Anna Nynca; Izabela Szczerbal; Karina Orlowska; Sylwia Swigonska; Monika Ruszkowska; Tomasz Molcan; Jan P Jastrzebski; Grzegorz Panasiewicz; Renata E Ciereszko
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Maternal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and the body burden in offspring of long-evans rats.

Authors:  Junzo Yonemoto; Tutomu Ichiki; Teiji Takei; Chiharu Tohyama
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 3.  Current Therapeutic Landscape and Safety Roadmap for Targeting the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Inflammatory Gastrointestinal Indications.

Authors:  Samantha C Faber; Tejas S Lahoti; Ewan R Taylor; Lauren Lewis; Jessica M Sapiro; Vicencia Toledo Sales; Yvonne P Dragan; Brandon D Jeffy
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 4.  A critique of the European Commission document, "State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters".

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman; Warren G Foster; Christopher J Borgert; Glen Van Der Kraak
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Comparison in the efficiency of different murine lines for genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Daniel Francisco Arencibia-Arrebola; Luis Alfredo Rosario-Fernández; Yolanda Emilia Suárez-Fernández; Alexis Vidal-Novoa; Livan Delgado-Roche
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2012-09

6.  Involvement of the Microglial Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Neuroinflammation and Vasogenic Edema after Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Miki Tanaka; Masaho Fujikawa; Ami Oguro; Kouichi Itoh; Christoph F A Vogel; Yasuhiro Ishihara
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.