OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible cross-contamination of laboratory specimens, as suggested by an increased incidence of newly diagnosed patients with tuberculosis, many of whom had all negative smears for acid-fast bacilli and only one positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture referred to as "negative smears, one positive" or NSOP. METHODS: Medical-record reviews were performed for all patients with NSOP results diagnosed at this facility within a 9-month period. Laboratory logbooks were reviewed for all isolates processed; DNA fingerprinting was performed on available isolates. RESULTS: Of 80 patients with NSOP results, 45 (56%) were found to have false-positive cultures resulting from laboratory contamination with H37Ra, an avirulent stock strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Laboratory cross-contamination resulted in the false diagnosis of tuberculosis in at least 45 individuals. Use of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube may have contributed to these contamination incidents by detecting small numbers of contaminating mycobacteria that may not have been detected with less sensitive media.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible cross-contamination of laboratory specimens, as suggested by an increased incidence of newly diagnosed patients with tuberculosis, many of whom had all negative smears for acid-fast bacilli and only one positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture referred to as "negative smears, one positive" or NSOP. METHODS: Medical-record reviews were performed for all patients with NSOP results diagnosed at this facility within a 9-month period. Laboratory logbooks were reviewed for all isolates processed; DNA fingerprinting was performed on available isolates. RESULTS: Of 80 patients with NSOP results, 45 (56%) were found to have false-positive cultures resulting from laboratory contamination with H37Ra, an avirulent stock strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Laboratory cross-contamination resulted in the false diagnosis of tuberculosis in at least 45 individuals. Use of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube may have contributed to these contamination incidents by detecting small numbers of contaminating mycobacteria that may not have been detected with less sensitive media.
Authors: D M Gascoyne-Binzi; R E Barlow; R Frothingham; G Robinson; T A Collyns; R Gelletlie; P M Hawkey Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Miguel Martínez; Darío García de Viedma; María Alonso; Sandra Andrés; Emilio Bouza; Teresa Cabezas; Isabel Cabeza; Armando Reyes; Waldo Sánchez-Yebra; Manuel Rodríguez; M Isabel Sánchez; M Cruz Rogado; Rosa Fernández; Teresa Peñafiel; Juan Martínez; Pilar Barroso; M Angeles Lucerna; L Felipe Diez; Carmelo Gutiérrez Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: David A J Moore; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Fanny Arenas; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Richard A Oberhelman; Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A W Evans; Jon S Friedland Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2006-05-06 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Jill M Northrup; Ann C Miller; Edward Nardell; Sharon Sharnprapai; Sue Etkind; Jeffrey Driscoll; Michael McGarry; Harry W Taber; Paul Elvin; Noreen L Qualls; Christopher R Braden Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: F K C Ribeiro; E M Lemos; D J Hadad; S C Leão; C Viana-Niero; R Dietze; J L Johnson; K D Eisenach; M Palaci Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: P Bifani; B Mathema; M Campo; S Moghazeh; B Nivin; E Shashkina; J Driscoll; S S Munsiff; R Frothingham; B N Kreiswirth Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.883