Literature DB >> 9701960

Comments on "Measuring memory for source: Some theoretical assumptions and technical limitations".

L A Henkel1, N Franklin.   

Abstract

Researchers must consider limitations and assumptions inherent in their measure of source monitoring when drawing conclusions, an important point raised by Murnane and Bayen (1998). However, the issues they raise do not invalidate the conclusions we draw from the findings reported in Henkel and Franklin (1998). Issues regarding conclusions about source monitoring performance, the relation between recognition and source accuracy, and the use of empirical and multinomial analyses are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701960     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Measuring memory for source: some theoretical assumptions and technical limitations.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

2.  Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects.

Authors:  L A Henkel; N Franklin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

3.  Fact and fantasy: The effects of internally generated events on the apparent frequency of externally generated events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; T H Taylor; C L Raye
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

4.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

5.  Fact and fantasy: the roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.

Authors:  M K Johnson; C L Raye; A Y Wang; T H Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1979-05

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.