Literature DB >> 9701537

The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations.

K L Turville1, J P Psihogios, T R Ulmer, G A Mirka.   

Abstract

Prolonged use of video display terminals (VDTs) has been shown to be a risk factor for musculoskeletal and visual discomfort. A standard workplace design recommendation is to position the centre of the VDT 15 degrees below horizontal eye level. Recently a viewing angle of 40 degrees below horizontal has been suggested based on studies that have indicated that this is the preferred viewing angle for visually intensive tasks. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of these two VDT positions on muscular activity, muscular fatigue, head/neck posture, visual acuity, operator performance (productivity and quality), heart rate and operator subjective assessment. The experimental task consisted of reading text from a computer screen and answering reading comprehension questions using a mouse and a keyboard. Each experimental session lasted 2 h. The 40 degree VDT position showed significantly greater head tilt angles and higher muscle activity levels for six of the 10 neck, shoulder and back muscles sampled. No significant differences in visual acuity, operator performance or heart rate were detected as a result of monitor location. Seven of the 12 subjects preferred the 15 degree monitor position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701537     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00048-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy.

Authors:  M A Veelen; J J Jakimowicz; R H M Goossens; D W Meijer; J B J Bussmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units.

Authors:  T Korhonen; R Ketola; R Toivonen; R Luukkonen; M Häkkänen; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Real-time occupational stress and fatigue measurement in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Ocular surface area and human eye blink frequency during VDU work: the effect of monitor position and task.

Authors:  Pernille Kofoed Nielsen; Karen Søgaard; Jørgen Skotte; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  A Survey of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Twinkle Dabholkar; Sujata Yardi; Yogesh G Dabholkar; Haritosh K Velankar; Gaurav Ghuge
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 6.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Discriminating between individuals with and without musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity by means of items related to computer keyboard use.

Authors:  Nancy A Baker; Nancy B Sussman; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08

8.  Risk factors for the onset and persistence of neck pain in undergraduate students: 1-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Siriluck Kanchanomai; Prawit Janwantanakul; Praneet Pensri; Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Sustaining biological welfare for our future through consistent science.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Shimomura; Tetsuo Katsuura
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.867

10.  Does use of a virtual environment change reaching while standing in patients with traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Amanda Y Schafer; Ksenia I Ustinova
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.