Literature DB >> 9701433

Respiratory mechanics in ventilated COPD patients: forced oscillation versus occlusion techniques.

R Farré1, M Ferrer, M Rotger, A Torres, D Navajas.   

Abstract

The respiratory mechanics of artificially ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were investigated by means of the forced oscillation (FOT) and the end-inspiratory airway occlusion (AOT) techniques. FOT was applied to measure respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) from 0.25-16 Hz. Maximum (Rmax) and minimum (Rmin) resistances, static elastance (Est) and time constant (T) were computed by AOT. FOT and AOT data were interpreted with models featuring airway wall shunt, tissue viscoelasticity and parallel inhomogeneity. Rrs* and Xrs*, predicted from the AOT data, were computed and compared with Rrs and Xrs measured by FOT. Rrs and Xrs (hPa x s x L(-1)) decreased from 31.2+/-10.3 to 5.9+/-4.6 and increased from -20.3+/-7.1 to -8.0+/-4.4 from 0.25-16 Hz, respectively. Central resistance (Rc) and peripheral resistance (Rp) (in hPa x s x L(-1)), and shunt elastance (Esh) and tissue elastance (Et) (in hPa x L(-1)) were 4.4+/-5.4, 28.4+/-153, 723+/-393 and 31.8+/-10.1, respectively. Rmin, Rmax and Est were 18.4+/-5.9, 28.4+/-12.8 and 18.1+/-4.2 respectively, and T=0.76+/-0.25 s. The frequency dependence of predicted Rrs* and Xrs* differed markedly from that of measured Rrs and Xrs. The use of different models to interpret the measured data suggests that both airway and tissue properties determined the frequency dependence of respiratory resistance and respiratory reactance in ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at the investigated frequencies (0.25-16 Hz).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701433     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  6 in total

1.  Effect of generator nonlinearities on the accuracy of respiratory impedance measurements by forced oscillation.

Authors:  P L de Melo; M M Werneck; A Giannella-Neto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Respiratory input impedance measurement: forced oscillation methods.

Authors:  D MacLeod; M Birch
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Measurement of respiratory system resistance during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Claude Guerin; Jean-Christophe Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Emergent behavior of regional heterogeneity in the lung and its effects on respiratory impedance.

Authors:  David W Kaczka; Kenneth R Lutchen; Zoltán Hantos
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-02-03

5.  Total inspiratory and expiratory impedance in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Karla Kristine Dames Silva; Agnaldo José Lopes; José Manoel Jansen; Pedro Lopes de Melo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Forced oscillation assessment of respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients.

Authors:  D Navajas; R Farré
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.