Literature DB >> 9701196

Modulation of fecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk: a high-starch Chinese diet did not generate expected beneficial changes relative to a Western-type diet.

J G Muir1, K Z Walker, M A Kaimakamis, M A Cameron, M J Govers, Z X Lu, G P Young, K O'Dea.   

Abstract

In a randomized, crossover dietary intervention study, 12 Australians (of white descent) consumed a diet typical of low-income communities in China and an average Australian diet so that effects on fecal markers thought to be relevant to colon cancer risk could be compared. The Chinese diet contained 35.3 g starch/MJ daily [including 2 g resistant starch (RS)/MJ and 1.5 g nonstarch polysaccharides (NSPs)/MJ]; the Australian diet contained 12 g starch/MJ daily (including 0.8 g RS and 2.7 g NSPs/MJ). Subjects followed each diet for 3 wk. Serum cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower after the low-fat, high-starch Chinese diet than after the Australian diet (mean +/- SEM: 4.17 +/- 0.30 compared with 5.04 +/- 0.28 mmol/L, respectively, P < 0.05), a difference indicative of dietary compliance. Fecal pH was lower after the Chinese diet (6.51 +/- 0.04) than after the Australian diet (6.63 +/- 0.05; P < 0.05). For all other fecal markers examined, however, the Chinese diet produced less favorable changes, including lower fecal bulk (86 +/- 11 compared with 141 +/- 20 g wet wt/d, P < 0.01), slower transit through the gut (69 +/- 6 compared with 56 +/- 7 h, P = 0.06), lower fecal concentrations of short-chain fatty acids [72.8 +/- 7.3 compared with 98 +/- 7.6 mmol/L (including butyrate: 12.2 +/- 1.3 compared with 18.4 +/- 2.3 mmol/L), P < 0.05], and higher fecal concentrations of potentially damaging ammonia (540 +/- 50 compared with 450 +/- 40 mg/L, P < 0.01) and phenols (109.2 +/- 13.2 compared with 68.5 +/- 12.9 mg/L, P < 0.01). These results suggest that consumption of a high-starch diet alone is insufficient to reduce the risk of developing colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701196     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/68.2.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  2 in total

1.  Does the biomarker 15N-lactose ureide allow to estimate the site of fermentation of resistant starch?

Authors:  Lieselotte Cloetens; Vicky De Preter; Henriette De Loor; Paul Rutgeerts; Kristin Verbeke
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Effect of Native and Acetylated Dietary Resistant Starches on Intestinal Fermentative Capacity of Normal and Stunted Children in Southern India.

Authors:  Ramadass Balamurugan; Srinivasan Pugazhendhi; Gowri M Balachander; Tamilselvan Dharmalingam; Elissa K Mortimer; Geetha L Gopalsamy; Richard J Woodman; Rosie Meng; David H Alpers; Mark Manary; Henry J Binder; Ian L Brown; Graeme P Young; Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.