OBJECTIVES: The effect of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) on tooth fracture resistance has not previously been investigated. The aims of this in vitro study were to examine the fracture resistance of a group of extracted maxillary premolar teeth with mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations of amalgam, and restored or unrestored simulated NCCL. METHOD:Forty sound maxillary, premolar teeth were divided at random into four groups, each of 10 teeth, which were fixed crown uppermost and long axis vertical in stainless steel moulds. Groups 1,2,3 and 4 were prepared with standardized parallel-sided MOD cavities, then restored with amalgam. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were further prepared with standardized NCCL. The NCCL in Group 1 were restored using a resin-modified polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement, and the NCCL in Group 2 were restored with an adhesive composite resin system. The NCCL in Group 3 were left unrestored. The specimens were loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1 using a universal testing machine. RESULTS:Mean fracture loads (KN) of 1.08, 1.03, 0.98 and 1.14, respectively, were recorded for Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4. Two-way ANOVA and Scheffe's Multiple Range Test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the presence of a standardized NCCL in an extracted maxillary premolar tooth does not reduce the fracture resistance of the tooth when loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1. The restoration of NCCL with the materials tested did not result in an increase in the fracture resistance of the previously restored premolar teeth, when loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The effect of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) on tooth fracture resistance has not previously been investigated. The aims of this in vitro study were to examine the fracture resistance of a group of extracted maxillary premolar teeth with mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) restorations of amalgam, and restored or unrestored simulated NCCL. METHOD: Forty sound maxillary, premolar teeth were divided at random into four groups, each of 10 teeth, which were fixed crown uppermost and long axis vertical in stainless steel moulds. Groups 1,2,3 and 4 were prepared with standardized parallel-sided MOD cavities, then restored with amalgam. Groups 1, 2 and 3 were further prepared with standardized NCCL. The NCCL in Group 1 were restored using a resin-modified polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement, and the NCCL in Group 2 were restored with an adhesive composite resin system. The NCCL in Group 3 were left unrestored. The specimens were loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1 using a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean fracture loads (KN) of 1.08, 1.03, 0.98 and 1.14, respectively, were recorded for Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4. Two-way ANOVA and Scheffe's Multiple Range Test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the presence of a standardized NCCL in an extracted maxillary premolar tooth does not reduce the fracture resistance of the tooth when loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1. The restoration of NCCL with the materials tested did not result in an increase in the fracture resistance of the previously restored premolar teeth, when loaded compressively at 1 mm min-1.